![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I want extra free meals so I can become obese and get an extra seat in the future. What a retarded ruling. Oops, now I'm insensitive to both mentally handicapped and morbidly obese people.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's Canada for petes sake...you really think they would have ruled differently?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hope they are not lumping overeaters/"food addicts" into this ruling, I feel it should be reserved for a very few severely obese people who suffer verifiable physical disorders. If the disease concept of food addiction is honored here in this ruling, then I feel they need to provide smokers with a place on airplanes (and every other public place), and us drug addicts should have an area on the flight to get a little higher if need be
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I envision an excessively neat squeeky white board drawing. The word lumping works well here as well. Attachment 1101 Last edited by pgardn : 05-09-2009 at 10:45 AM. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh sure...forget about the dyslexics.
Now..we have to buy BOTH seats 23 and 32. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() |