anyone have opinion on this horse today?

[dellinger63]

Originally Posted by docicu3

Next you'll be telling me your going to get 12-1 on Thatsrightofficer in the 8th...No more than 5-1 if your lucky...

Statebred going against the likes of Lt. Ron? W/no scratches he'll be way closer to 12-1 than 5-1. Lt. Ron will get pounded IMO.

[ontheoutside]

im sorry im not as astute as you
but every publication has him at 30-1
weather its a mistake or not
how would i no that?im just reading what i see in 6 publications and everyone has him at 30 -1
if its a mistake
fine
but thats what it says
wish i was as smart as you to no its a mistake

i no lol

[Bigsmc]

Originally Posted by ontheoutside

im sorry im not as astute as you
but every publication has him at 30-1
weather its a mistake or not
how would i no that?im just reading what i see in 6 publications and everyone has him at 30 -1
if its a mistake
fine
but thats what it says
wish i was as smart as you to no its a mistake

Do yourself a favor and stop looking at M/L odds.

Do your homework and decide what odds you need in order to place a wager on a horse. Do not let a M/L sway you in either direction.

[Rudeboyelvis]

Originally Posted by ontheoutside

im sorry im not as astute as you
but every publication has him at 30-1
weather its a mistake or not
how would i no that?im just reading what i see in 6 publications and everyone has him at 30 -1
if its a mistake
fine
but thats what it says
wish i was as smart as you to no its a mistake

I lolled a little at that.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by ontheoutside

im sorry im not as astute as you
but every publication has him at 30-1
weather its a mistake or not
how would i no that?im just reading what i see in 6 publications and everyone has him at 30 -1
if its a mistake
fine
but thats what it says
wish i was as smart as you to no its a mistake

Every publication gets it from the same source, and as a previous poster pointed out, you can ( and, frankly, did ) figure it out for yourself. It was pretty obviously wrong.

We corrected it and even gave you full credit on the air. Thanks again for pointing it out.