aqu - today race 9

[gales0678]

instead of looking at times , why not ask yourself if the horse had opened up a 2 or 3 length the horse could have gotten brave on the front and cruised to victory

why strangle the horse in the 2nd qtr and discourge the horse from running?

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by gales0678

instead of looking at times , why not ask yourself if the horse had opened up a 2 or 3 length the horse could have gotten brave on the front and cruised to victory

why strangle the horse in the 2nd qtr and discourge the horse from running?

You asked me to explain it to you, I ( clearly wasted ) a lot of time trying to do just that, and you keep standing by your opinion. Fine....go ahead. However, don't ask in the future if you refuse to listen to reason.

I think you need to watch the race again, as what you are saying bears no relation to what actually took place in the race.

[gales0678]

andy - 2 questions about historical races

76' derby if cordero had not let bold forbes run at any point of thart race would he have won?

'89 preakness - after pay day made the lead when he made the move on the backstretch why slow easy goer down , let him keep going and let sunday silence try to catch him?

horses just cant be turned on by a flick of the switch and when you try to hold em down sometimes they wont start again

if the #3 had lost today with hill opening up more in the 2nd qtr i could have lived with it , but , by strangling the horse in the 2nd qtr he allowed the #1 to stay close and in the race and essentialy all cv had to do was outspint him for 2F