LeBron James..OVERRATED

[ateamstupid]

I don't watch the Cavs every night like Morty does, so I can only speak as someone whose team has played LeBron 12 times in the last year. He's possibly the scariest physical specimen to ever step on the court. He doesn't scare me all that much as a player though, and that should be pretty alarming, since Kobe and Chris Paul and even guys like Chauncey Billups always make me nervous.

Not only does Brick James suck from the FT line, he still has yet to develop a consistent jumper, which is absolutely necessary for a wing of course. How can he be the best player in the league (as many claim) when I shout at the TV "give him space, make him shoot it!" every time he's on the perimeter in a clutch situation? I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one saying that..

Honestly, he's as strong as an ox, so part of me thinks he would actually be better playing mainly in the post, but that's beside the point.

I also think that if there were no foul limit, he'd be more effective, as he could drive to the basket more often, where he's unstoppable once he gets some steam.

Maybe I'm influenced by how inept he was in the EC Semis, but I agree with Mort here.

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

I don't watch the Cavs every night like Morty does, so I can only speak as someone whose team has played LeBron 12 times in the last year. He's possibly the scariest physical specimen to ever step on the court. He doesn't scare me all that much as a player though, and that should be pretty alarming, since Kobe and Chris Paul and even guys like Chauncey Billups always make me nervous.

Not only does Brick James suck from the FT line, he still has yet to develop a consistent jumper, which is absolutely necessary for a wing of course. How can he be the best player in the league (as many claim) when I shout at the TV "give him space, make him shoot it!" every time he's on the perimeter in a clutch situation? I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one saying that..

Honestly, he's as strong as an ox, so part of me thinks he would actually be better playing mainly in the post, but that's beside the point.

I also think that if there were no foul limit, he'd be more effective, as he could drive to the basket more often, where he's unstoppable once he gets some steam.

Maybe I'm influenced by how inept he was in the EC Semis, but I agree with Mort here.

!!!!!!!OOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

I don't watch the Cavs every night like Morty does, so I can only speak as someone whose team has played LeBron 12 times in the last year. He's possibly the scariest physical specimen to ever step on the court. He doesn't scare me all that much as a player though, and that should be pretty alarming, since Kobe and Chris Paul and even guys like Chauncey Billups always make me nervous.

Not only does Brick James suck from the FT line, he still has yet to develop a consistent jumper, which is absolutely necessary for a wing of course. How can he be the best player in the league (as many claim) when I shout at the TV "give him space, make him shoot it!" every time he's on the perimeter in a clutch situation? I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one saying that..

Honestly, he's as strong as an ox, so part of me thinks he would actually be better playing mainly in the post, but that's beside the point.

I also think that if there were no foul limit, he'd be more effective, as he could drive to the basket more often, where he's unstoppable once he gets some steam.

Maybe I'm influenced by how inept he was in the EC Semis, but I agree with Mort here.

Of course you would think the best way to play him is to give him space. That's no different than Kobe Bryant or Michael Jordan. I'm not saying he's as good a shooter as those two but you've got to try to take something away and that's got to be his driving. Why on earth would anyone want to play up on him and take away the jumper and allow him the driving lanes?

I'm actually surprised by the amount of criticism he gets. He easily scores 30 a night and if he wasn't so unselfish, could probably be up around 35-40. He single-handedly beat Detroit in the East Finals a couple of years ago and led his team to the championship series. Of all the teams to face the Celtics in the playoffs last year, his team played them the tightest and anyone that disagrees that that happened because of LeBron just doesn't know basketball. He's the reason guys like Gibson and Sczerbiak get the open shots they do. When he's going to the basket, he's getting the attention of every single defender. That's what enables their big guys to get offensive rebounds. I remember the same thing used to be true of Dominique Wilkins. His coaches would say that sometimes, a bad shot by Dominique was a good shot for the team because it led to offensive rebounds and easier shots. When guys are open, he finds them. He's the best passer in the league, including point guards. No doubt that he has weaknesses in his game. His defense could use some work. His jumper could use some work. He needs to shoot better from the line. But the Cavs would probably not finish in the upper half of the ACC without him.

[Mortimer]

Oh my God.




And you were doing so well.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

Of course you would think the best way to play him is to give him space. That's no different than Kobe Bryant or Michael Jordan. I'm not saying he's as good a shooter as those two but you've got to try to take something away and that's got to be his driving. Why on earth would anyone want to play up on him and take away the jumper and allow him the driving lanes?

I'm actually surprised by the amount of criticism he gets. He easily scores 30 a night and if he wasn't so unselfish, could probably be up around 35-40. He single-handedly beat Detroit in the East Finals a couple of years ago and led his team to the championship series. Of all the teams to face the Celtics in the playoffs last year, his team played them the tightest and anyone that disagrees that that happened because of LeBron just doesn't know basketball. He's the reason guys like Gibson and Sczerbiak get the open shots they do. When he's going to the basket, he's getting the attention of every single defender. That's what enables their big guys to get offensive rebounds. I remember the same thing used to be true of Dominique Wilkins. His coaches would say that sometimes, a bad shot by Dominique was a good shot for the team because it led to offensive rebounds and easier shots. When guys are open, he finds them. He's the best passer in the league, including point guards. No doubt that he has weaknesses in his game. His defense could use some work. His jumper could use some work. He needs to shoot better from the line. But the Cavs would probably not finish in the upper half of the ACC without him.

Are we going to resume our nightly battles Kg? Looks like you are re-energized.

These guys have actually made me have to defend Lebron. If they only knew.

Best athlete in the NBA... possibly ever.

Needs a consistent jump shot and foul shot.
His instincts have improved.

He will be the best.
Even though he is nowhere near the basketball player
Kobe, Duncan, Michael, or Bird, are/were.

Agree with Mortunses on the 3's. But all he needs is a decent
jumper and the hole will be wide open.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by pgardn

Best athlete in the NBA... possibly ever.

Needs a consistent jump shot and foul shot.
His instincts have improved.

He will be the best.
Even though he is nowhere near the basketball player
Kobe, Duncan, Michael, or Bird, are/were.
Agree with Mortunses on the 3's. But all he needs is a decent
jumper and the hole will be wide open.

Nowhere near? What do you base that opinion on? Certainly not stats.

Originally Posted by dalakhani

Nowhere near? What do you base that opinion on? Certainly not stats.

Ability to see the floor.
Hands, leadership, feeling the pace of the game
and adjusting accordingly.
Anticipation on defense and positioning.

no not stats. Worthless pile o crap in many cases.
in baskeball one plays with other people.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by pgardn

Ability to see the floor.
Hands, leadership, feeling the pace of the game
and adjusting accordingly.
Anticipation on defense and positioning.

no not stats. Worthless pile o crap in many cases.
in baskeball one plays with other people.

I get it. "intangibles". Thats like arguing about God.

Are you going to tell me that Larry Bird was a better defender than Lebron at any stage of his entire life? Or even close?

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

Of course you would think the best way to play him is to give him space. That's no different than Kobe Bryant or Michael Jordan. I'm not saying he's as good a shooter as those two but you've got to try to take something away and that's got to be his driving. Why on earth would anyone want to play up on him and take away the jumper and allow him the driving lanes?

I'm actually surprised by the amount of criticism he gets. He easily scores 30 a night and if he wasn't so unselfish, could probably be up around 35-40. He single-handedly beat Detroit in the East Finals a couple of years ago and led his team to the championship series. Of all the teams to face the Celtics in the playoffs last year, his team played them the tightest and anyone that disagrees that that happened because of LeBron just doesn't know basketball. He's the reason guys like Gibson and Sczerbiak get the open shots they do. When he's going to the basket, he's getting the attention of every single defender. That's what enables their big guys to get offensive rebounds. I remember the same thing used to be true of Dominique Wilkins. His coaches would say that sometimes, a bad shot by Dominique was a good shot for the team because it led to offensive rebounds and easier shots. When guys are open, he finds them. He's the best passer in the league, including point guards. No doubt that he has weaknesses in his game. His defense could use some work. His jumper could use some work. He needs to shoot better from the line. But the Cavs would probably not finish in the upper half of the ACC without him.

OK..now I'm upset.

I admit I am sure I don't know nearly as much as you...but some things are self evident.


Over time I have admitted that James is clearly far and way the best on the team. He's the best at driving the lane in the league and agree the best passer. Other things you mentioned go hand in hand with all that.


He's a bad 3 point shooter and takes far too many 3's. He's not good at the line...which diminishes he's driving ability. He's no special player on defense.He has more holes than I believe you may want to admit...he's also selfish most of the time. No guy who falls well below the league average in 3's should be taking so many 3's...for one thing.


Then about the Cavs without him. Of course they're not good....you can say that about a lot teams if all of a sudden their best player went poof! It's just a poor and unfair characterization. That said..the main reason the Cavs played Boston so well was team defense.....no way it was all James. There are some good players on that team. I didn't say all stars ,but people like to bash them as if they wouldn't even play 10 minutes for any other team.

James is what he is;a great athlete with a little more to go before he becomes a great player.He had one big game against Boston..the rest were not sa hot to horrible.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

Of course you would think the best way to play him is to give him space. That's no different than Kobe Bryant or Michael Jordan. I'm not saying he's as good a shooter as those two but you've got to try to take something away and that's got to be his driving. Why on earth would anyone want to play up on him and take away the jumper and allow him the driving lanes?

I'm actually surprised by the amount of criticism he gets. He easily scores 30 a night and if he wasn't so unselfish, could probably be up around 35-40. He single-handedly beat Detroit in the East Finals a couple of years ago and led his team to the championship series. Of all the teams to face the Celtics in the playoffs last year, his team played them the tightest and anyone that disagrees that that happened because of LeBron just doesn't know basketball. He's the reason guys like Gibson and Sczerbiak get the open shots they do. When he's going to the basket, he's getting the attention of every single defender. That's what enables their big guys to get offensive rebounds. I remember the same thing used to be true of Dominique Wilkins. His coaches would say that sometimes, a bad shot by Dominique was a good shot for the team because it led to offensive rebounds and easier shots. When guys are open, he finds them. He's the best passer in the league, including point guards. No doubt that he has weaknesses in his game. His defense could use some work. His jumper could use some work. He needs to shoot better from the line. But the Cavs would probably not finish in the upper half of the ACC without him.

I have never wanted Kobe or Jordan to take an open shot.

I WANT my team to give LeBron an open jumper. Anyone who watches basketball knows that there are certain guys you dare to shoot. LeBron is one of those guys, and is by far the best player to be one of those guys, IMO. Kobe and Jordan were/are definitely not those guys.

Simply put, if he could shoot jumpers and free throws, he'd be one of, if not the best in history. He still can't do either. I frankly don't think he cares enough to work to be great in those areas.