![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ok then lets go back to the Civil War.
If the North's major source of income was agriculture do you think the North would have played a role in freeing the slaves? What was inherent in the genes or upbringing of the oh so moral North that made them the abolitionists they were? Its not there. The North was industrialized, they did not need slave labor, it was easy to be against it. The roles would have been completely reversed if you change the geography that led to agriculture v. industrial. And what makes anyone think if they lived in a society in which they were taught from birth that blacks needed this work and were not fully human that they would have been immune to this... Anyone on this board could have been a fervent Nazi under the correct conditions. Signed, Phil and Ethel Nincompoop.....we mean Garden |