![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Wait, are we talking about The Tin Man again?? Oh, you're talking Arabians...sorry!! ![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
lol.....great one.. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
LOL, if the Tin Man ran 6F in 1:18, then how fast did the rest of them run?
A grade one winner in the premier turf race of the year outside the BC. Doesnt matter how he got it done. He did. Get over it. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like The Tin Man. I really do. I'll like him even more as a bettor the next time he races in that company. He stole the race....aint nothin' wrong with that, but let's call a spade a spade. Most of the credit should actually go to Espinoza, in my opinion.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Don't forget to give all the other jockey's their credit too....they were incredibly generous in letting Victor and TTM jog like they did. Very kind of those guys. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That's true. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, Garrett and Ace should have dueled with the Tin Man so Todd Plectcher could win another big stake. Just what everybody needs.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
So if a horse like ENglish Channel or Cacique sat off of a hypothetical duel between Tin Man and Ace going 23.4 and won, their victories would have been deemed more worthy.
I just dont understand you guys who regard a wire to wire victory like this as phony. Sort of like saying Tiger Woods going Thurs through Sunday in the lead doesnt count as much, hmmmmm? Hmmmmm? |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
No, it's not like saying that at all ![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I never said the win was a phony....but it was an absolute gift and a total toss when handicapping for races in the fall. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
No Kev, that wasnt thrown at you.
Lets not forget Cacique's win in the Manhattan was wire to wire. The great Lure won most of his races wire to wire if I am not mistaken. Skip Away won a bunch like that as well. Doh! |