7/12-13 (DEL): Delaware H/Oaks Weekend

[hockey2315]

Whoa Jeremy Plonk agrees with you?! I must be wrong then. . . This debate is stupid - I was just disagreeing with you for the sake of disagreeing - it's a reflex now every time you post.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by hockey2315

Whoa Jeremy Plonk agrees with you?! I must be wrong then. . . This debate is stupid - I was just disagreeing with you for the sake of disagreeing - it's a reflex now every time you post.

You forgot Jerardi as well and anyone else with half a brain.

Again, if you cant man up and admit you were wrong then that makes you a ______.

Best of luck.

[hockey2315]

I won't admit to being wrong because I'm not - but I will admit to overstating a bit. You've become the new VI so I had to attack - for THAT I'm sorry.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by hockey2315

I won't admit to being wrong because I'm not - but I will admit to overstating a bit. You've become the new VI so I had to attack - for THAT I'm sorry.

Common pattern here. Someone makes a statement. Out of the blue, someone disagrees STRONGLY, in this case "youre way off here". Person who makes original statement disagrees and provides evidence to support original contention.

Then, person who originally disagrees STRONGLY, finds that his contention is completely baseless and instead of admitting as much decides to attack the poster with the original statement.

You are a very small little voice who has been beaten in this case. So shut up and quit embarassing yourself. Unless of course you can find something tangible to prove me wrong.

Another internet tough guy. LOL.

[hockey2315]

Your claim was that "Its amazing that a grade 2 ten furlong race for fillies and mares at Del Park is coming up as one of the most competitive races of the year in any division."

It's simply not that competitive - if Hystericalady gets clear enough and can get the distance she wins. If not, overrated horse for course Unbridled Belle wins. Maybe Spring Waltz gets involved.

The bottom line is that your original claim was kind of worthless and for some reason at the time I was in the mood to argue about it - now I just don't care. . .

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by hockey2315

Your claim was that "Its amazing that a grade 2 ten furlong race for fillies and mares at Del Park is coming up as one of the most competitive races of the year in any division."

It's simply not that competitive - if Hystericalady gets clear enough and can get the distance she wins. If not, overrated horse for course Unbridled Belle wins. Maybe Spring Waltz gets involved.

The bottom line is that your original claim was kind of worthless and for some reason at the time I was in the mood to argue about it - now I just don't care. . .

About as worthless as claiming 22 and change quarters going 11f is "overrated"? LOL. No, you win that one.

As far as your opinion, I would say THAT is pretty worthless.

"if hysterical lady gets clear enough and can get the distance she wins"- a profound statement by hockey

NO **** sherlock...LOL. You really went out on a limb there. What is the difference between saying that and..

"if spring waltz runs back to her gulfstream races and she likes the track, she wins."

or

"unbridled belle runs back to her previous Delaware races, she wins."

or

"if mooncatcher can_______"



You havent said ****. Thats my point. Instead of looking to troll people why dont you learn a little something. You havent demonstrated any knowledge or any original thought that would put you in any position to criticize anyone else. You are merely a troll that has obviously picked the wrong target.

And what is up with that stupid Screen name? Hockey? What the **** is that?

[hockey2315]

I'm really not interested in getting in to this with you. . . You said the race was soooo competitive - I restated the obvious to say it ISN'T that competitive. . . Only a few horses have any shot barring something strange. Did the 11 horse field throw you off or did you look at the PPs before claiming the races incredible competitiveness. As for the rest of the stuff on the bottom - you're way off - and I think people on here would back me up. The screen name thing is incredibly childish - but if you want an explanation - it's just my really old AOL screen name. . . I guess you're right - i'm just and uncreative troll.

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

Common pattern here. Someone makes a statement. Out of the blue, someone disagrees STRONGLY, in this case "youre way off here". Person who makes original statement disagrees and provides evidence to support original contention.

Then, person who originally disagrees STRONGLY, finds that his contention is completely baseless and instead of admitting as much decides to attack the poster with the original statement.

You are a very small little voice who has been beaten in this case. So shut up and quit embarassing yourself. Unless of course you can find something tangible to prove me wrong.

Another internet tough guy. LOL.

perhaps you should follow your own advice.

[dalakhani]

Originally Posted by ArlJim78

perhaps you should follow your own advice.

I take it arljim78 means that you are 30 years old. If you are 30 years old, and you have time to make 6000 posts on a forum, you need to find a girlfriend or a blowup doll.

I would think, based on your responses, you will have more luck with the latter.

[ArlJim78]

Originally Posted by dalakhani

I take it arljim78 means that you are 30 years old. If you are 30 years old, and you have time to make 6000 posts on a forum, you need to find a girlfriend or a blowup doll.

I would think, based on your responses, you will have more luck with the latter.

your act is tiresome and transparent.

perhaps if you had a boyfriend you wouldn't feel the need pose as an internet "tough guy".