![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Does he have to win to go to the Arc?
I would have to say yes |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Asmussen says "no":
http://racing.bloodhorse.com/article/46041.htm Quote:
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Glad that ESPNews is showing it, going to have to find it somewhere in Wrigleyville after the Cubs game, I am sure Cubbie Bear will have it on somewhere.....
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() he gets 4 pounds off red rocks, i reckon if RR runs his race, Curlin would have to beat him by about 10 lengths to be considered a challanger for the Arc..
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() #Grand |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() i'm curious if they have a plan B, should he not look the best. they've already implied that the BC classic is not interesting, because winning it back to back has already been done.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Let's say his performance in the Manhattan is adequate but not scintillating. How about giving him a chance at the Breeders Cup Turf? The field shouldn't be as deep and he would have a chance to the have the only BC Classic/BC Turf double.
__________________
A racehorse is an animal that can take several thousand people for a ride at the same time. ~Author Unknown |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I'm guessing he wins this race solidly.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I would say if he's only adequate in the Man O War, that's not going to cut it in the BC Turf either. I mean I have no problem if they run him in these turf races, but they seem to be on a mission to prove his greatness, and to do something no other horse has done before, which to me means more than just acquiting himself well. who knows. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Didn't his connections toss around the idea of further international racing beyond France?
Should this weekend's turf experiement prove a colossal flop, they could always aim for something like the Japan Dirt Cup to increase his bankroll and international resume. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() What about the Woodward followed by the JCGC? Does that just make too much sense to even be considered or what?
I don't understand the fact that they want this horse to prove his greatness and yet at the same time want to avoid high weights. If he is as good as they seem to think, why not run him in some real handicap races? I think the fact that they are trying him on turf is very interesting, but if it doesn't work out tomorrow (and I'm not completely sold on the fact that it will) why not return to dirt, spot the other contenders some weight and then try to beat them? It seemed to work out okay that way for top horses for about a century. Why couldn't it work for Curlin? |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Not necessarily win, but certainly must look like one of the best.
__________________
Do I think Charity can win? Well, I am walking around in yesterday's suit. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A very interesting article on dirt to turf super stars here.
http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/hor...emy&id=3479881 |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() If he doesn't go to the front, get the lead with some sensible fractions, and fight them off at the end, there is no way he wins.
Sudan will wire this field. When Better Talk Now and co. start running, Curlin won't know what to do. Has to go to the front... |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I'm looking forward to this race more than any race I can remember in my 10+ years of seriously following horse racing
I can't go against Curlin...so I'll throw him in a 3 horse tri-box with Red Rocks and Sudan Last edited by Mike : 07-11-2008 at 09:24 PM. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Lava Man, as pointed out in the article, is the only horse since Vanlandingham in 1985, to win Grade 1s on dirt and turf. This is a huge race. The biggest since the Kentucky Derby (well, maybe tied with the Belmont S.).
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]()
__________________
![]() |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
PM me |