I don't know the numbers being talked about (at what point Churchill's ADW is sufficiently profitable in its eyes), but all anyone has done for the past year or so is repeatedly bash the "corporate" mentality of Churchill Downs as it relates to the company's poor treatment of the bettor/customer. Why all of a sudden is it assumed that it is the horsemen that are wrong in this dispute? Has anyone though that maybe the problem is that Churchill is treating the horsemen the same way it treats the bettor/customer?
|
07-03-2008, 03:08 PM
Threaded Mode