Curlin works on turf

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Scav

I think it is his way of saying that he doesn't think the horse is much on the turf

While I have no real opinion on it, the horse is bred out the ass for the lawn, so he could even be better then he is on the dirt, which would be real freaky

I think this is what is referred to as " speaking out of your ass. "

[Scav]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I think this is what is referred to as " speaking out of your ass. "

How isn't he bred for the turf, his sire has thrown multiple turf stars and has Deputy Minister on his bottom. It isn't Kingmambo over a Theatrical mare but there is green in his pedigree

From a breeding perspective, I see no reason why he wouldn't take to the lawn.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Scav

How isn't he bred for the turf, his sire has thrown multiple turf stars and has Deputy Minister on his bottom. It isn't Kingmambo over a Theatrical mare but there is green in his pedigree

From a breeding perspective, I see no reason why he wouldn't take to the lawn.

First of all, you said " he is bred out the ass for turf " which is the overstatement of the year and the kind of crap the VI spews here. Now you seem to be switching gears. I never said he had no turf breeding, and there is plenty of sire influence, but maybe you should also take a good look at his dam side production. I am not saying this is even the most important thing, however you are basically making definitive assertions with, at best, a minor amount of information.

On the final remark, it would also be fair to say the opposite. I am not saying that will be the case but more I am pointing out the uselessness of the comment.

Here's the bottom line, any smart horseplayer looks to bet against horses like Curlin, a good dirt horse that is overbet when trying the turf for the first time. However, apparently with some's desperate zest to annoint Curlin the greatest horse since Hindoo, all common sense is flying out the window.

[Scav]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

First of all, you said " he is bred out the ass for turf " which is the overstatement of the year and the kind of crap the VI spews here. Now you seem to be switching gears. I never said he had no turf breeding, and there is plenty of sire influence, but maybe you should also take a good look at his dam side production. I am not saying this is even the most important thing, however you are basically making definitive assertions with, at best, a minor amount of information.

On the final remark, it would also be fair to say the opposite. I am not saying that will be the case but more I am pointing out the uselessness of the comment.

Here's the bottom line, any smart horseplayer looks to bet against horses like Curlin, a good dirt horse that is overbet when trying the turf for the first time. However, apparently with some's desperate zest to annoint Curlin the greatest horse since Hindoo, all common sense is flying out the window.

VI?

I never annointed him a thing, I said I didn't have an opinion on it just that he is bred for the lawn, I'll take back the statement of him being 'bred out the ass', the fingers were just flowing when typing.

I think that generation gaps cause alot of this, I haven't seen the horses that you have seen since you have been around so long, so maybe my perspective isn't as deep as yours.

[blackthroatedwind]

If you don't know who the VI is then it might be you....or maybe it should be.

[Strategic Mission]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

Here's the bottom line, any smart horseplayer looks to bet against horses like Curlin, a good dirt horse that is overbet when trying the turf for the first time. However, apparently with some's desperate zest to annoint Curlin the greatest horse since Hindoo, all common sense is flying out the window.

Any smart horseplayer wouldn't play the race at all. It isn't like there are a bunch of Europeans coming in for the Arlington race or Man O War. He is likely to face nothing special. The nominations are pretty weak.

http://www.equibase.com/premium/eqbH...0080712-477451

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Strategic Mission

Any smart horseplayer wouldn't play the race at all.

And you are qualified to make this blanket statement.....because?

[tiggerv]

I am also confused on why you would not want to play a race where you can take a stand against a 1-5 horse

[Strategic Mission]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

And you are qualified to make this blanket statement.....because?

Because it is true.

Maybe nobody should have opinions except for you self-proclaimed "experts".

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by Strategic Mission

Because it is true.

Maybe nobody should have opinions except for you self-proclaimed "experts".

Actually, I'm not self-proclaimed....but loved the whine nonetheless.

Here's some news for you.....there are all kinds of sharp bettors and every pool probably contains at least one. I highly doubt you are in any kind of position to make the blanket statement that " no sharp bettor " would be involved in ANY pool.