Gotta love this broad

[stonegossard]

So they just had Maggi Moss on HRTV going on and on about fixing racings problems and how the sport needs so much help. She then implies it's wrong to go after guys like Assmussen and Dutrow. 2 guys who have repeatdly been caught cheating. It's ridiculous hearing from someone about all the problems in racing who employs some of the biggest cheaters out there...Assmussen...Contessa...Lake.

She is just adding to the problem by defending the guys who are the cause of all the problems. Her defense with assmussen is it was most likely sabotage. Gimme a freakin break. This is a dangerous route to go down....pretty soon all the cheaters will use this as an excuse. It's pretty cut and dry...your horse tests postive, you do the time/penalty. She really needs to shut her trap.

[FGFan]

Originally Posted by stonegossard

So they just had Maggi Moss on HRTV going on and on about fixing racings problems and how the sport needs so much help. She then implies it's wrong to go after guys like Assmussen and Dutrow. 2 guys who have repeatdly been caught cheating. It's ridiculous hearing from someone about all the problems in racing who employs some of the biggest cheaters out there...Assmussen...Contessa...Lake.

She is just adding to the problem by defending the guys who are the cause of all the problems. Her defense with assmussen is it was most likely sabotage. Gimme a freakin break. This is a dangerous route to go down....pretty soon all the cheaters will use this as an excuse. It's pretty cut and dry...your horse tests postive, you do the time/penalty. She really needs to shut her trap.

Apparently we listened to different interviews because that is not at all what I heard her say, and I just watched it, DVR delayed.

I don't like or dislike Maggi Moss, which is not the forums sentiment. It is very clear in this thread how the forum members percieve her. As well this just plays into the internet hysteria that even surfaced in this thread when someone said Amoss had a positive without any evidence whatsoever, "just a feeling". Well, having a positive and someone suggesting you had a positive are two completely different things.

Your comments are the same, you heard what you wanted to hear and are relaying that interview based on your sentiment.

What she said is that there is no uniformity in the drug testing situation, particularly in Texas. They will not do any bloodwork to perform quantative evidence of doping. She also stated that a LSU Dr. had reviewed the testing and said that it is possible it was a contamination, but because of the way Texas conducts their testing once postive there is no further testing, like bloodwork which is much better standard to use than urine. Or that it had been metabolized, which is much different than injecting to block.

She never implied it was wrong to go after Assmusen or Dutrow. What she did say was that it would be ludicrous for Assmussen to have injected a 1/5 filly in a MSW, what would be the point, particularly in a state like Texas.

She also spoke about the terrible things that do happen in this sport, that horses are abused, blocked, slaughtered and so on. BUT because there is no uniformity state to state, no definitive way to do testing, someone can test positive in Texas but not test positive in Kentucky which has a much better process of testing. The fact there is no standard from track to track this is what she wants to address.


Oh and you forgot to mention another foundation she has established to help owners that can't afford to fix their injured animals and therefore have to euthanize them. Her foundation would help owners to save horses that get injuries that are expensive and let them be retired.

I'm not her cheerleader here, although it sounds like it, I really have no opinion, but if you are going to relay information make it more truthful of what was said and not just your "feelings"

[Danzig]

interesting tho that it's only the same few getting caught with this 'unfair' testing...

as an aside tho--i think it speaks to some on this board, that when they have a problem with a womans opinion and statements, they attack her looks, her figure, and talk about whether she's doable. quite a shame. way to enter the 21st century guys.

[Bigsmc]

Originally Posted by Danzig

interesting tho that it's only the same few getting caught with this 'unfair' testing...

as an aside tho--i think it speaks to some on this board, that when they have a problem with a womans opinion and statements, they attack her looks, her figure, and talk about whether she's doable. quite a shame. way to enter the 21st century guys.

Bah.

As far as attacking her looks, there was a photo of her posted. That will automatically get the comments going. There have been plenty of posts calling Dutrow fat and mocking how much he sweated during the Belmont. For the record, I do not think he is doable.

This board doesn't just pick on women, we are equal opportunity offenders.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by Bigsmc

Bah.

As far as attacking her looks, there was a photo of her posted. That will automatically get the comments going. There have been plenty of posts calling Dutrow fat and mocking how much he sweated during the Belmont. For the record, I do not think he is doable.

This board doesn't just pick on women, we are equal opportunity offenders.

good point!

[FGFan]

Originally Posted by Bigsmc

Bah.

As far as attacking her looks, there was a photo of her posted. That will automatically get the comments going. There have been plenty of posts calling Dutrow fat and mocking how much he sweated during the Belmont. For the record, I do not think he is doable.

This board doesn't just pick on women, we are equal opportunity offenders.

That kind of stuff..the doable question...well I could care less about. It is what it is, best not wander into the rank-em threads if that stuff offends womans. I find it kinda funny.

And as far as Dutrow...I agree, I don't think he is doable either !

[philcski]

Originally Posted by FGFan

That kind of stuff..the doable question...well I could care less about. It is what it is, best not wander into the rank-em threads if that stuff offends womans. I find it kinda funny.

And as far as Dutrow...I agree, I don't think he is doable either !

LOL about Dutrow

[stonegossard]

Originally Posted by FGFan

Apparently we listened to different interviews because that is not at all what I heard her say, and I just watched it, DVR delayed.

I don't like or dislike Maggi Moss, which is not the forums sentiment. It is very clear in this thread how the forum members percieve her. As well this just plays into the internet hysteria that even surfaced in this thread when someone said Amoss had a positive without any evidence whatsoever, "just a feeling". Well, having a positive and someone suggesting you had a positive are two completely different things.

Your comments are the same, you heard what you wanted to hear and are relaying that interview based on your sentiment.

What she said is that there is no uniformity in the drug testing situation, particularly in Texas. They will not do any bloodwork to perform quantative evidence of doping. She also stated that a LSU Dr. had reviewed the testing and said that it is possible it was a contamination, but because of the way Texas conducts their testing once postive there is no further testing, like bloodwork which is much better standard to use than urine. Or that it had been metabolized, which is much different than injecting to block.

She never implied it was wrong to go after Assmusen or Dutrow. What she did say was that it would be ludicrous for Assmussen to have injected a 1/5 filly in a MSW, what would be the point, particularly in a state like Texas.

She also spoke about the terrible things that do happen in this sport, that horses are abused, blocked, slaughtered and so on. BUT because there is no uniformity state to state, no definitive way to do testing, someone can test positive in Texas but not test positive in Kentucky which has a much better process of testing. The fact there is no standard from track to track this is what she wants to address.


Oh and you forgot to mention another foundation she has established to help owners that can't afford to fix their injured animals and therefore have to euthanize them. Her foundation would help owners to save horses that get injuries that are expensive and let them be retired.

I'm not her cheerleader here, although it sounds like it, I really have no opinion, but if you are going to relay information make it more truthful of what was said and not just your "feelings"

Gimme a break.....when the whole thing went down with Allday vs Dutrow she came out swinging for Dutrow. Now she is defending Assmussen. She has a history of defending guys who have been caught over and over again. She employs guys like Lake, Contessa, Assmussen. Guys who are cheats. If she wants to "save" the sport , she should pull her horses from these guys and give em to real horsemen who dont have histories of positives. She is a lawyer...she is just spinning things her way.

You are nuts if you think people like her are good for the game.

[Danzig]

Originally Posted by stonegossard

Gimme a break.....when the whole thing went down with Allday vs Dutrow she came out swinging for Dutrow. Now she is defending Assmussen. She has a history of defending guys who have been caught over and over again. She employs guys like Lake, Contessa, Assmussen. Guys who are cheats. If she wants to "save" the sport , she should pull her horses from these guys and give em to real horsemen who dont have histories of positives. She is a lawyer...she is just spinning things her way.

You are nuts if you think people like her are good for the game.

i agree. she comes out with the 'this testing isn't done fairly' defense--but it's only affecting the many-times over cheaters that she is defending. go figure. but i'm sure it's just their bad luck.

and no, it doesn't 'make sense' that asmussen would risk something like that--but jails are FULL of people who you could say the same about--not a very good defense.

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by Danzig

i agree. she comes out with the 'this testing isn't done fairly' defense--but it's only affecting the many-times over cheaters that she is defending. go figure. but i'm sure it's just their bad luck.

and no, it doesn't 'make sense' that asmussen would risk something like that--but jails are FULL of people who you could say the same about--not a very good defense.

I think one of the main reasons that some of these cheating trainers are doing so well is because they use nerve blocks to take away the pain. Biancone was doing it with snake venom. These other guys are using stuff like mepivicaine and lidocaine.

The question is how they are normally able to give mepivicaine without it showing up. They must have some method of masking it that works 99% of the time. Asmussen, Pletcher, Mullins, etc. have all been caught using it. I highly doubt that the times they got caught were the only times that they used it. I think the times they got caught were just the tip of the iceberg.

[stonegossard]

Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin

I think one of the main reasons that some of these cheating trainers are doing so well is because they use nerve blocks to take away the pain. Biancone was doing it with snake venom. These other guys are using stuff like mepivicaine and lidocaine.

The question is how they are normally able to give mepivicaine without it showing up. They must have some method of masking it that works 99% of the time. Asmussen, Pletcher, Mullins, etc. have all been caught using it. I highly doubt that the times they got caught were the only times that they used it. I think the times they got caught were just the tip of the iceberg.

Let's look at Pletcher today. Runs two horses today that ran lights out great in Kentucky (where testing seems a bit lax compared to other places). They then both run horrendously /dead last today in NY. Coincidence? I think not. While Pletcher may be a "good guy" and pleasant on tv, it's beyond obvious since last summer at Saratoga that he has completely changed his ways in NY.

[hockey2315]

Pletcher's NY domination is definitely over. . . not sure why. . .

[Rupert Pupkin]

Originally Posted by stonegossard

Let's look at Pletcher today. Runs two horses today that ran lights out great in Kentucky (where testing seems a bit lax compared to other places). They then both run horrendously /dead last today in NY. Coincidence? I think not. While Pletcher may be a "good guy" and pleasant on tv, it's beyond obvious since last summer at Saratoga that he has completely changed his ways in NY.

I was actually thinking the same thing.

[FGFan]

Originally Posted by stonegossard

Gimme a break.....when the whole thing went down with Allday vs Dutrow she came out swinging for Dutrow. Now she is defending Assmussen. She has a history of defending guys who have been caught over and over again. She employs guys like Lake, Contessa, Assmussen. Guys who are cheats. If she wants to "save" the sport , she should pull her horses from these guys and give em to real horsemen who dont have histories of positives. She is a lawyer...she is just spinning things her way.

You are nuts if you think people like her are good for the game.

I never said I thought one way or the other whether or not they are good for the game. I just relayed what was actually said and NOT what you thought was said.

It's perfectly fine if you want to relay your take on an interview if you preference it by saying MY TAKE ON WHAT SHE SAID IS, or WHAT I GOT OUT OF THAT LAME INTERVIEW IS.....but you didn't you relayed it as fact which it wasn't even remotely what was discussed.

BTW she also didn't say it was sabotage, she said she thought it could possibly be contamination based on the findings of a renowned specialist. Another thought you had that you relayed as fact.

So let's see already in this thread we have people declaring that trainers got positives that never happened, discussions on how doable a woman owner is, and then your synopis of an interview that wasn't even remotely factual.

Yeah right and this all adds to making the game better........Gimme a break.

[stonegossard]

Originally Posted by FGFan

I never said I thought one way or the other whether or not they are good for the game. I just relayed what was actually said and NOT what you thought was said.

It's perfectly fine if you want to relay your take on an interview if you preference it by saying MY TAKE ON WHAT SHE SAID IS, or WHAT I GOT OUT OF THAT LAME INTERVIEW IS.....but you didn't you relayed it as fact which it wasn't even remotely what was discussed.

BTW she also didn't say it was sabotage, she said she thought it could possibly be contamination based on the findings of a renowned specialist. Another thought you had that you relayed as fact.

So let's see already in this thread we have people declaring that trainers got positives that never happened, discussions on how doable a woman owner is, and then your synopis of an interview that wasn't even remotely factual.

Yeah right and this all adds to making the game better........Gimme a break.

My take wasnt factual? Please. Go back to your DVR and watch it again. Go back and actually read what I said.

And get off your f#ckin high horse ...I dont need someone like yourself telling me how to post on here. If you dont agree with what I said fine...but dont start this bs about how I should post.

[FGFan]

Originally Posted by stonegossard

My take wasnt factual? Please. Go back to your DVR and watch it again. Go back and actually read what I said.

And get off your f#ckin high horse ...I dont need someone like yourself telling me how to post on here. If you dont agree with what I said fine...but dont start this bs about how I should post.

I don't need to go back and watch or read your posts. I wouldn't waste the time, mostly I ignore whatever it is you say.

The sentiment is the same.
I don't need someone such as yourself, the self-appointed, definitely not funny, board bully telling me anything.
If I choose to sit on my "f#ckin high horse" than I will.

If your such a fan of the game why do you complain about it so much?

I'm not telling you how to post, but their is a distinction between peoples take on things and what is the truth, obviously you can't understand that.
If you don't like it well I don't really care.

I guess from now on we'll call it the Derby Trail rumor board because Stone Gossard wants it that way....

[stonegossard]

Originally Posted by FGFan

I don't need to go back and watch or read your posts. I wouldn't waste the time, mostly I ignore whatever it is you say.

The sentiment is the same.
I don't need someone such as yourself, the self-appointed, definitely not funny, board bully telling me anything.
If I choose to sit on my "f#ckin high horse" than I will.

If your such a fan of the game why do you complain about it so much?

I'm not telling you how to post, but their is a distinction between peoples take on things and what is the truth, obviously you can't understand that.
If you don't like it well I don't really care.

I guess from now on we'll call it the Derby Trail rumor board because Stone Gossard wants it that way....

Board bully? Too funny. Because I disagree with you I am now a bully. I do post whats on my mind and dont sugarcoat things...big difference between that and a bully. As far as the game? I dont complain more than anyone else out there. If you are content with the current situation of horse racing (drugs...etc) then so be it. I think owners like Maggi Moss who continue to use questionable trainers are not good for the game. I dont see how any real horse racing fan could applaud someone like that. As far as her little horsey farm...IEAH is doin something very similar...does that make them good for the game? I said in my posts its ridiculous that she defends guys like DUtrow and Assmussen (as she did today)...not sure why you keep twisting around what I say.

If you dont like my posts fine...then dont bother with your rather ignorant posts to me. Funny how someone who ignores my posts knows so much about me.

Why would you call it my rumor board? Last time I checked I am not the one on here with the inside info posting rumors. In fact I NEVER post things I hear from people in the business. You seem like a very confused individual.