![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Not that anyone would condone what may have happened....but I hope he is not being punished outside of the rules because....A - the horse suffered the supposed injury and B - because of a concern over public backlash. If the rules need to be fixed, then fix them, but making examples, especially at a time of hysteria like now, is a very slippery slope.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Russell Baze got 15 (30?) days for misuse of the whip. Six months for Rose would seem very excessive.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
and didnt that horse die in the baze case? (just asking... nobody get on my case if i am not right because I dont know for sure!) |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Wasn't the Baze case an incident of him trying to ride out a horse who appeared to be going wrong just before the wire?
This sounds like straight up abuse if it is true. Baze could always say that he wasn't sure his horse was going wrong until it was too late. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If all of this is true then it's an appropriate suspension. These guys have to be punished where it hurts...the wallet.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The part that has always befuddled me is the gross disparity between sanctions handed down to jockeys and those handed down for trainers. If he is going to get six months, then "the authorities" are saying that his offense is 2-3X worse than the misdeeds of trainers with "bad" positives. It just doesn't compute. No wonder the riders feel that they are treated as if they are a fungible commodity.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Why on earth is Rose hitting a horse with a whip on the head?? Was it accidental or was he just banging him on the noggin??
__________________
The Main Course...the chosen or frozen entree?! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I just watched it - it was Appeal To The City in the 3rd at Delaware Park yesterday.
Right before the wire he smacks the horse in the face with a left handed whip. Watch for yourself at Cal Racing. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Just watched the replay. What an absolute clown.
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I agree that the jockeys' appeals until December render the "typical" careless riding suspensions meaningless. The trainers that you referenced are the only ones that I can remember getting penalties that severe, and I doubt their misdeeds were unintentional. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I hope you arent saying that using an electrical device is the equal to a medication positive? Maybe for etorphine. As we have discussed far too often about positive tests, the system sucks, most positives have no effect on the horse, and the vast majority are for allowed meds. A "machine" is blatantly illegal. I can remember lots of trainers getting 30 to 45 day suspensions including Pletcher. The difference between a jockey getting days and a trainer getting days is that the trainer has employees and expenses that dont go away. A jock packs his stuff and goes on vacation. Not to mention the trouble caused for the connections who have to scramble to find a new rider, often after the best jocks are already locked up. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Baze popped that horse twice trying to hold on to a placing finish in the stretch run of a race in Northern California where I am not convinced his use of the whip was excessive at all or that he even knew the horse was in trouble when he hit him the first time. He backed off the whip within less than a second but unfortunately he was dealing with a horse who had suffered an injury and he looked abusive in front of a grandstand for all to see. An incident during a race should be treated completely differently than an action after a race such as what Stokes did one night at the Mountain recently or the jock in Philly who was disciplined a couple months back. |