![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What was written by Miraja above is a huge problem in Science.
But writers like Asimov, Gould, Dawkins, are all writers that have done real science. Same for Sagan. Even though he got a little maudlin at times with the sci fi. Also RIP. Sagan wrote a great book on what science is and is not that should be read by all who like the power of logic and reasoning, "The Demon Haunted World". Of course one could conclude that the book is terribly flawed, look who recommends it. ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Love Sagan. . . Have you read Smolin's "The Trouble with Physics"? I have it but can't decide if I feel like reading it yet. . .
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I think the one I mentioned is Sagan's best nonfiction. It really is so well written and reasoned out. Should be required reading for all those that go to card-readers or astrologists. And those probed by Aliens. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The stuff is very difficult for me. Quantum mechanics is also very difficult. The big and the small end of Physics are tough for things like us in the middle. It really is just modeling based on some data and lots of math. It is very counterintuitive to our everday analogies. So much so that it is given names that very often innaccurately portray what the physicists are actually trying to get across. As an example: The word Wave in Physics is a very difficult concept. It seems easy enough, water, waves, but E-M waves are so much different. But its the best description... acchhh its kind of like just naming phenomena automatically messes up the real idea. I dont know if that makes any sense but it does to a biochemistry guy turned physics teacher. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I know what you mean. . . string/m theory, quantum mechanics, etc... are very counterintuitive and hard to understand unless you're a theoretical physicist. . . I'm more concerned with the implications of those types of theories rather than the actual science because I'm a philosophy major. . .
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Very cool stuff. I have a few books by Bertrand Russell, The History of Western Philosophy was one and it was very cumbersome but very interesting. I was totally blown away that people were thinking so deeply so far back. Huge misconception I had. I was especially interested in the logic stuff. The civics and way to govern stuff not as much. And then I read this stuff about Kurt Goedel in a book called Pi in the Sky and that just through me for a loop. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
demon haunted world should be required reading for all. i'd add the two richard feynman books, "surely you're joking, mr feynman!" and "what do you care what other people think?". the former for the head. the latter for the heart. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Richard Feynman is also really good. This is sort of the reason I started this thread. I knew people were out there ... Horse Racing can attract some very diff. types. Kinda weird. Im not sure why. Sort of artsy, sort of science I guess. Just dont have the time to understand as much as I should. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Hawai'i Magazine. Man it really sends me out there. I love the stories about the Paniolo on Parker's Ranch. You know, they go to the sports bars at 7am their time to watch horse racing.
![]()
__________________
![]() |