REAL HORSE meeting Good For Nothing Turf Sprinters

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I like the people who think there is comparable speed in the race to run with First Defence. Now that's funny.

If he breaks even close to clean he can have whatever lead he wants. He is so much faster early than his competition it's incredible.

are you being a "richard "again andrew........

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

are you being a "richard "again andrew........

No. If you actually looked at the pps and really think there is contending speed then you don't know what you're looking at.

Sorry. But that's the truth. First Defence, if he breaks clean, can have any lead he wants.

[blackthroatedwind]

He's even worse on the turf than dirt.

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

No. If you actually looked at the pps and really think there is contending speed then you don't know what you're looking at.

Sorry. But that's the truth. First Defence, if he breaks clean, can have any lead he wants.

thanks capt obv...

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

thanks capt obv...

That's actually being a dick.

Yes, it was obvious that he was lone speed, but you suggested he wasn't. I didn't announce here that it was some sort of genius conclusion that he had a huge pace advantage....I assumed it was a given. Then you contradicted that notion. Were you being a dick? I doubt it......because you're not one ( as opposed to me ). However, what you also said was patently false and misleading should anyone happen to read it and not really understand the race.

Keep it up....and you may have to change your name to scudsupsideyourhead.

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

That's actually being a dick.

Yes, it was obvious that he was lone speed, but you suggested he wasn't. I didn't announce here that it was some sort of genius conclusion that he had a huge pace advantage....I assumed it was a given. Then you contradicted that notion. Were you being a dick? I doubt it......because you're not one ( as opposed to me ). However, what you also said was patently false and misleading should anyone happen to read it and not really understand the race.

Keep it up....and you may have to change your name to scudsupsideyourhead.

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

That's actually being a dick.

Yes, it was obvious that he was lone speed, but you suggested he wasn't. I didn't announce here that it was some sort of genius conclusion that he had a huge pace advantage....I assumed it was a given. Then you contradicted that notion. Were you being a dick? I doubt it......because you're not one ( as opposed to me ). However, what you also said was patently false and misleading should anyone happen to read it and not really understand the race.

Keep it up....and you may have to change your name to scudsupsideyourhead.

not really you beat up on the fatman for starting a threat about an obv choice.. then proceded to defend the horse who as most of us know was the easy early speed ..he just hung on and you contend that we ..the rest of the world would be fools to try and beat em..and i didnt suggest he wasnt the early speed...not much to understand ..a huge drop in class and first turf .aka lets just get a win...and i am a dick...

[hoovesupsideyourhead]

Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead

not really you beat up on the fatman for starting a threat about an obv choice.. then proceded to defend the horse who as most of us know was the easy early speed ..he just hung on and you contend that we ..the rest of the world would be fools to try and beat em..and i didnt suggest he wasnt the early speed...not much to understand ..a huge drop in class and first turf .aka lets just get a win...and i

am a dick...

of course i can not ask a rod about it..lol