![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
i'll stick with the idea that a transcript of the stewards discussion should be available.
that way they don't need to explain anything. it's already there in the open air. what is the argument against this? |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
also, i think you would find that the decisions would become more consistent as a result of having to explain them. i'm sure of it.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Thanks so much. V |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I wish we had what the Hong Kong Jockey Club has..... one main site for all results, all incidents reports, everything. I know it would be a lot of work to get something like that going though. In the meantime, having a link on Cal Racing or Equibase..... somewhere! I'm just wondering how many other people had no clue that this was available. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I agree with this approach...
__________________
We've Gone Delirious |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Vic,
The 2nd at Belmont today is a prime example. Jock wanted to object, but no outrider to lodge it with, race was made official very quickly, before he got back to call the stewards, so nothing allowed. The stewards should have at least looked at it, or at very least, explained why they wouldn't allow the objection to be lodged (especially since the outrider that was supposed to be there, wasn't in the 1st turn, to note that a jock wanted to object.. which is something that Jerry Bailey caught right away and noted on tv). John |