![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I don't understand why there is all the nitpicking about this fine paper. Sure it stinks that the price is $5.50 on newstands but they have to cover the costs of manufacturing and distributing the paper. I use Formy 4.1 most of the time and it's worth its weight in gold. I have a laser printer and buy rebuilt printing cartridges so I can print hundreds of cards before I need a new cartridge. Once I have the card printed I use Formy 4.1 to look up the charts and at times trainer info. I prefer Formy 4.1 but the print paper is fine. The main difference is I have to look up charts in my archives for the last three when I buy the print edition. Nonetheless I always buy a next day Form when I go to Belmont or Saratoga. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Frankel's money burning 6 horse in the 1st at Hollywood on 5/16 is a FTG (gelded on 04/19/08 according to the Cal Vet List Report) and DRF can't get this info in the form? Seems like a real lame excuse, at least for Cal this info is available, why it isn't in the form is beyond me.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() He's listed as a gelding in the DRF, but with the info given you have no clue when he was gelded. DRF's database should have shown that he was a colt for the 4/12 start and is now a gelding, some notation in the form should show this.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
But here's one reason you might not want this specfic info publicized. If you know a horse is a FTG and most of the bettors do not. That's an edge which you have over your competition. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The gelding situation has been explained endlessly....but I will do it for the 567th time..... Providing information that is right SOME of the time is far worse than not providing it at all. The very simple fact is that gelding information is provided by the Jockey Club and a very poor job is done reporting this information. Some jurisdictions, like California, do a great job, while some, like Florida, do a terrible job. As the system stands now it is impossible for DRF to get the information anywhere close to accurately thus they cannot provide it reliably. It is the system that needs to be changed, and I strongly believe it should be, but until that is done DRF cannot responsibly provide information that is not 100% accurate.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() The DRF has always done well by me. Prices increase. That's economics.
I guess when I'm betting hundreds of dollars over a course of a day, I'm not really thinking about the $5.50. I guess I equate that to someone driving around the area of Nelson Avenue for a half hour trying to save a dollar or two on parking when they are about to bet a few hundred bucks. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() i don't use the form on a regular basis, although I like to pick one up on Saturdays to read at breakfast. but what I don't get is the idea that its overpriced. it comes to less than $1 a card, and you get very good pp's, commentary, analysis, features. i think its a great bargain. of course if you play a lot there are other ways you can go but still, not a bad deal if you ask me.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|