Brutal

Mortimer · #1 05-11-2008, 11:53 PM

I will soon need a new head .

How many times do I have to tell you? You said Cleveland could still win ,but gave absolutely no basis for it...already having said the Celtics had better everything.So how you reached that conclusion only PoisonSumac knows.What this has to do with who anyone is rooting for...I don't even think PoisonSumac knows.

I was very precise in how Cleveland can win....they have to go to what is called on offensive scheme and not Boneheadball....which you can clear clearly discern if you saw 1 and 2 ...and then the 3rd game.If they play game 3 they win..if they go back to 1 and 2 they lose.

Take it or leave it.

Mortimer · #2 05-11-2008, 11:57 PM

By the way---if you can't spot the difference in the offense the Cavs inserted for the last game.....you are not nearly the Dr.Ramsey you purport to be.

#3 05-12-2008, 12:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Avery_Smartman

I will soon need a new head .

How many times do I have to tell you? You said Cleveland could still win ,but gave absolutely no basis for it...already having said the Celtics had better everything.So how you reached that conclusion only PoisonSumac knows.What this has to do with who anyone is rooting for...I don't even think PoisonSumac knows.

I was very precise in how Cleveland can win....they have to go to what is called on offensive scheme and not Boneheadball....which you can clear clearly discern if you saw 1 and 2 ...and then the 3rd game.If they play game 3 they win..if they go back to 1 and 2 they lose.

Take it or leave it.

Mortonsus, Mortonsus.
We are practicing the art of deception.
I never said the bolded.

So if Lebron scores less than 13 points
every game you say the Cavs win the series?

Take it or leave it?
Damn it to hell.
You shoved me out to a precipice 1 inch
high. The pressure is too great.

We could disagree on the 2nd bolded every other time
down the floor.

And finally, finally, finally
your noble, but nonartitstic attempt
to replicate past bets for
obvious, but admirable reasons
is gallant. Even if it deals
with monopoly money.

What is the pillgardn/mortunsus ratio
as of THIS thread then?

Good night and have a pleasant tomorrow.

Mortimer · #4 05-12-2008, 09:17 AM

I said the second statement you put in bold!

( Is it me? )

You had said the Celtics had a better defense....a better offense.....they have Cleveland by a ratio of AT LEAST 4:1 in the creative arts.

And it's funny how everyone from fan to writer to tv commentator can see the difference in the offense........but you, the man who cut out the bottom of the peach basket, cannot.

Now I know how Hossy felt.

Debate with MainCourse...I would pay to see that one.

No I wouldn't .

Mortimer · #5 05-12-2008, 10:18 AM

And the man's a teacher.......don't ya know.

Mortimer · #6 05-12-2008, 10:50 AM

Right now he's in class.....cursing the steel ball that he can't get into the steel ring.

horseofcourse · #7 05-12-2008, 11:15 AM

I don't have time to read through all this that I missed. THe Cavs played a good game Saturday. Today will be different I think. Will likely be a close game. All I know is when the team shoots 50 percent they usually don't just win...they usually blow people out of the gym. The problem is they often have problem reaching that mark and often have problems even reaching the 45 percent mark...or even the 40 percent mark.

The team bailed LeBron out Saturday which is possible on rare occasions...but despite another ridiculous shooting game by the "something One" he played a pretty efficient and effective overall floor game...the big difference being he decided not to turn the ball over 8 or 9 times. Even when he shoots poorly he can still be a big asset as he was Saturday...he's a really good player most times. He wasn't in game's one and two. NOthing more need be said.

I'm not going to read the rest. That's my statement on the series.

horseofcourse · #8 05-12-2008, 11:21 AM

It would have served zero purpose for me to even look on this thread Thursday night or Friday!! I choose not to look!!

Mortimer · #9 05-12-2008, 11:23 AM

Hey....that was good,HOC. I'll buy that.

My BIG problem with James is his insistence on being a ball hog so he can achieve his international business goals.

When the team runs a facsimile to an NBA offense the supporting cast is plenty good enough to win. When they run the BOENHEAD offense against the better teams in the playoffs...it ain't gonna woik.

But the guy will never learn....he had one of his kiddies next to him at the post game press conference trying to destroy the microphone in front of her.

What a schwantz.

Mortimer · #10 05-12-2008, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horseofcourse

I don't have time to read through all this that I missed. THe Cavs played a good game Saturday. Today will be different I think. Will likely be a close game. All I know is when the team shoots 50 percent they usually don't just win...they usually blow people out of the gym. The problem is they often have problem reaching that mark and often have problems even reaching the 45 percent mark...or even the 40 percent mark.

The team bailed LeBron out Saturday which is possible on rare occasions...but despite another ridiculous shooting game by the "something One" he played a pretty efficient and effective overall floor game...the big difference being he decided not to turn the ball over 8 or 9 times. Even when he shoots poorly he can still be a big asset as he was Saturday...he's a really good player most times. He wasn't in game's one and two. NOthing more need be said.

I'm not going to read the rest. That's my statement on the series.

Oh poo.

I did find some errors.

Yes....James wins all the games...when his offense sucks---his defense wins.

Yes...I forgot you two are stuck on how terrible this supporting cast is.If James truly turns to playing a team game and with they way Brown seems to have finally discovered a rotation the Cavaliers can win the title.

Just remember he's not going to get there without this horrible supporting cast.

But I can't see James doing that through to the desired end.

Mortimer · #11 05-12-2008, 03:45 PM

THe Cavs played a good game Saturday. Today will be different I think. Will likely be a close game.

You are responsible for that mess above...MainCourse.

You are wrong...as per usual.

They play the same NBA authorized offense they will win big...maybe even bigger.

horseofcourse · #12 05-12-2008, 04:01 PM

Please seek treatment.

I'm done with this. LeBron James in my opinion has helped the Cleveland Cavaliers win basketball games in his years with the team. I think he is a tremendous basketball player.

If that belief makes me crazy so be it. I will stand by it.

I sincerely hope LeBron shoots 3 for 28 tonight and they lose by 1 point so you can live out the rest of your life in glory and continue to have lots of fun at the expense of Main Course and pee garden and whomever else entertains you endlessly.

Your coolness is beyond my limited skill set. I honestly cannot comprehend this stuff. It's freaking NBA basketball. I want the Cavs to win. I want LeBron to have good games. I think he's a good player.

AGain, if that makes me inferior so be it. I acquiesce.

Mortimer · #13 05-12-2008, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horseofcourse

Please seek treatment.

I'm done with this. LeBron James in my opinion has helped the Cleveland Cavaliers win basketball games in his years with the team. I think he is a tremendous basketball player.

If that belief makes me crazy so be it. I will stand by it.

I sincerely hope LeBron shoots 3 for 28 tonight and they lose by 1 point so you can live out the rest of your life in glory and continue to have lots of fun at the expense of Main Course and pee garden and whomever else entertains you endlessly.

Your coolness is beyond my limited skill set. I honestly cannot comprehend this stuff. It's freaking NBA basketball. I want the Cavs to win. I want LeBron to have good games. I think he's a good player.

AGain, if that makes me inferior so be it. I acquiesce.

Well that is one sissified response.

If you will recall...you started out some time ago opining how great he was....how he's a one man team...how he has no faults....how the Cavs provide no support and if this dismal team was better they would be champions...

....well look at you now.

Back then,as you know, I told you he was a great athlete...that he drove to the hole better than anyone.....but that his ego gets in the way and he does have weaknesses....and that the team is a lot better than you say it is---the supporting cast.

You just don't seem to see him for what he is although I have tried to point that out many,many times.

I never said I did not want the Cavaliers to win; I said they need to play a team game in order to win it all...and that means James changing....which I don't think he can do over a stretch of time. He thinks too much of himself.

Mainly because witnesses like you and HoseGarden are blind to the act.

Oh get out of my sight-----I'm pretty disgusted with the 2 of you

#14 05-12-2008, 08:38 PM

So Morton what type of game do we have so far?

(I have returned from work and I am typing dont ya know)

Do we have a bonehead game or schematic?

#15 05-12-2008, 08:43 PM

I have seen the Cavs score without Lebron touching the ball.
I have seen lebron Score taking it immediately to the hole.

What type of game is it as of this point?

#16 05-12-2008, 08:47 PM

End of the first quarter.
What type of offensive game for the Cavs?

Oh I bet he is finding a bit of difficulty...

And lets just not talk about defense since it
has nothing to do with the outcome apparently.

Cavs now up by 6. I have seen two offenses.
Call it Morton? Bonehead or schematic?
Better wait to see the outcome of the entire
game so you can call it after its over. Its easier
that way. You call em like you see em, and if you
dont see um, you make em up?