![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
thank you for not taking me seriously as I was just checking. how can you believe in a split variant in this case when the races not only were run on the same day but also without any significant change in conditions and were even not far apart in time between races?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
All it takes is a little work on the track by the maintenance crew. There was a turf race in between, which is usually a prime time for working on the dirt track. Understanding the horses in any given race is just as important at looking at how all the races relate to each other. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
chops just slightly sore but thanks for the info
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
by the way ever see any beyer one turn charts for over a mile?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The time of the 10th race backs up the split variant.
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
raw beyer of 98 for mdspwt oops
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
first race at bel cheap claimer ran 89 raw so was it that different first to last?
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The last race was run with a raw figure of 99, a sorry off the turf contest for NY bred MSWs. The winner had one lifetime race where he ran well and earned a 67. The runner up is a pretty bad animal who ran a 38 in his lone start at 24 to 1. The 3rd place horse is a terrible maiden, Another Hades, destined for Finger Lakes. He is an up and down type in his 10 races, and when he runs well he tops out in the mid 60s. The winner beat Another Hades by 5 lengths, which is about 12 points. If you assume he ran his best, which is a stretch, the winner projects to improve about 10 points to a 77, which is pretty reasonable. That means the track was 22 points fast, or four points faster than the first race. The Beyer guy changed the variant 6 points, and it makes sense to me because I doubt AH ran his top. Of course, there are other races in between to consider as well, but this post is long enough already to make the general point. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Am I the only one here that wasn't totally floored by Casino Drive's race Saturday?
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I certainly wasn't floored. It was decent in my opinion, nothing more.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Just more nebulous nonsense from BBB |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just a thought here...
Regarding the 10th race at Belmont on Saturday....I was expecting a very good effort from Phobia... he had been training very well on the training track at Saratoga...he demolished a couple of different workmates...he had a very good work from the gate....his gallop outs could have been a little better but nonetheless a much improved performance was expected....and in fact his performance was definately much improved... His opening qtr in 22.17 and a final qtr in 24 & change with a final time of 1:10.60 for NYbred mdns was fast but the workouts that I saw suggested he was going to run very well |