Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-05-2006, 05:38 PM
Cajungator26's Avatar
Cajungator26 Cajungator26 is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hossy's Mom's basement.
Posts: 10,217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exceller
bb is right. no race for 9 months.
The colt was off of training for 3 months which means that he was NOT sitting in a stall for 9 months. Thank you...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-05-2006, 05:43 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajungator26
The colt was off of training for 3 months which means that he was NOT sitting in a stall for 9 months. Thank you...
Cajun, I believe the horse was out of training from the BCC of 2005 to May of 2006. So that is about 5-6 months. But I am sure he was jogged and all that good stuff. But remember the main goal is the BCC. This is what is wrong with the Breeders Cup.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-05-2006, 05:49 PM
Thunder Gulch's Avatar
Thunder Gulch Thunder Gulch is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southland Greyhound Park
Posts: 1,846
Default

Clearly not good today, but calling this horse a fraud is shortsighted. He's already run faster than almost every horse in the country, so toss this race and let's see what he does next time. The goal is to run his best race at Churchill this fall, and I'm not one to question the methods of the top trainer in America.
__________________
Do I think Charity can win? Well, I am walking around in yesterday's suit.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-05-2006, 05:50 PM
sumitas sumitas is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,362
Default

i suppose the tip was when Mayne, on ESPN, said Pletcher said FA was not 100% coming into this race.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-05-2006, 07:02 PM
Exceller Exceller is offline
Ellis Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eurobounce
Cajun, I believe the horse was out of training from the BCC of 2005 to May of 2006. So that is about 5-6 months. But I am sure he was jogged and all that good stuff. But remember the main goal is the BCC. This is what is wrong with the Breeders Cup.
he did not race for 8 months.

FA is a really good horse but what I meant by nothing special is that he is not a st liam/ghostzapper type. invasor probably is.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-05-2006, 07:47 PM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

Hes no horse of the year canindate. Thats for sure. Lava Man and Bernardini are the only two possibilities. Flower Alley has no shot. That was a dismal performance and at 3/2 to boot.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-05-2006, 08:07 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,941
Default

i said elsewhere that i was never high on the horse, but i think fraud is too strong a word. he's got a lot of redeeming to do right now if he wants to get back into the hoy picture....

obviously flower alley wasn't ready for today. whether he was short, out of shape, or lack of seasoning....or a bit of all. pletcher said he wasn't fit, that he expected him to peak in two more races. but wow, no way tap thought flower alley would finish out of the money.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-05-2006, 08:09 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,941
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gander
Hes no horse of the year canindate. Thats for sure. Lava Man and Bernardini are the only two possibilities. Flower Alley has no shot. That was a dismal performance and at 3/2 to boot.
you don't think invasor has a shot at hoy? i'd say he has more of a shot at it right now than bernardini.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-05-2006, 09:19 PM
pgardn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I dont see how a horse that came in a very tough second as a 3 YEAR OLD at the BCC can be considered a fraud. How many races can Invasor run like that? That had to take the starch out. Heroic effort to hold off Sun King in a meltdown.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-05-2006, 09:36 PM
jpops757 jpops757 is offline
Sheepshead Bay
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Garland tx [Dallas area]
Posts: 1,103
Default

If surf Cat can return and the conections will send him east he should be in line for some consideration for HOY. Nothing but brialance on the track.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-05-2006, 10:02 PM
alysheba4 alysheba4 is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,424
Default

i just hope he didnt get hurt, i have a bad feeling though because he is no fraud.......
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-05-2006, 11:33 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exceller
he did not race for 8 months.

FA is a really good horse but what I meant by nothing special is that he is not a st liam/ghostzapper type. invasor probably is.
I know he hasnt raced in 8 months. I was talking about training not racing.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-05-2006, 11:36 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This might be Todd Pletchers worse training performance of his career. If Flower Alley goes on to lose the JCGC and BCC then it is all on Pletcher. He had the route mapped out since last Dec.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-05-2006, 11:37 PM
1st_Saturday_in_May 1st_Saturday_in_May is offline
Washington Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 844
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exceller
he did not race for 8 months.

FA is a really good horse but what I meant by nothing special is that he is not a st liam/ghostzapper type. invasor probably is.
He's probably as good as Saint Liam or atleast close. Neither of them (SL or Invasor) are like Ghostzapper. He was far superior when on his game...
__________________
Reppin the Duquesne University class of 2009 . (Then its time to get a real job )

I cant believe what a bunch of nerds we are. We're looking up money laundering in the dictionary.

www.myspace.com/dustinfabian
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-05-2006, 11:40 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1st_Saturday_in_May
He's probably as good as Saint Liam or atleast close. Neither of them (SL or Invasor) are like Ghostzapper. He was far superior when on his game...
See I dont get where St Liam was all that good.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-05-2006, 11:49 PM
1st_Saturday_in_May 1st_Saturday_in_May is offline
Washington Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 844
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eurobounce
See I dont get where St Liam was all that good.
St. Liam wasnt that great at all but the best of his season. I think Invasor is currently the best of his season but neither have knocked my socks off so to speak with talent so I rank them very similarly. Invasor could and maybe will prove to be better, but St. Liam did show up for the most part when asked so he has a BC win in his favor. For speculations sake (and nothing more), if Invasor goes on to win the BCC I think he and St. Liam will go down in history viewed about the same. Nice horses, not overly spectacular, more gritty than flashy. I just think Ghostzapper was in a league of his own.
__________________
Reppin the Duquesne University class of 2009 . (Then its time to get a real job )

I cant believe what a bunch of nerds we are. We're looking up money laundering in the dictionary.

www.myspace.com/dustinfabian
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-05-2006, 11:52 PM
eurobounce
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1st_Saturday_in_May
St. Liam wasnt that great at all but the best of his season. I think Invasor is currently the best of his season but neither have knocked my socks off so to speak with talent so I rank them very similarly. Invasor could and maybe will prove to be better, but St. Liam did show up for the most part when asked so he has a BC win in his favor. For speculations sake (and nothing more), if Invasor goes on to win the BCC I think he and St. Liam will go down in history viewed about the same. Nice horses, not overly spectacular, more gritty than flashy. I just think Ghostzapper was in a league of his own.
I couldnt agree more. St Liam won by default last year in the BCC.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-06-2006, 06:19 AM
Dunbar's Avatar
Dunbar Dunbar is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1st_Saturday_in_May
For speculations sake (and nothing more), if Invasor goes on to win the BCC I think he and St. Liam will go down in history viewed about the same. Nice horses, not overly spectacular, more gritty than flashy. I just think Ghostzapper was in a league of his own.
Ghostzapper didn't look like he was "in a league of his own" when St Liam had him fully extended to win the only race the ran against each other. St Liam ran with him around the turn and the entire stretch, only to lose by a fraction of a length. GZ WAS a special horse, I agree. But elevating GZ at St Liam's expense doesn't cut it.

It's still too early to rate Invasor. But I don't see how anyone can fault what Invasor has done so far. VERY nice horse.

--Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar
photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-05-2006, 09:07 PM
Bold Brooklynite
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cajungator26
The colt was off of training for 3 months which means that he was NOT sitting in a stall for 9 months. Thank you...
Dearest Madam,

I was speaking metaphorically when I said he was standing ... not sitting ... in a stall for nine months. That was a figure of speech ... for the fact that the horse hadn't raced in nine months.

You know what a "figure of speech" is don't you? That's correct.

One, two, three, four ... when spoken ... are all figures of speech.

Sheeeeeeeeeeeeesh !!!

Last edited by Bold Brooklynite : 08-05-2006 at 09:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.