![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I would prefer a new system to decide who gets in as well, although I don't really know what would be fair.
Perhaps graded earnings in races a mile or longer. That would take out the winners of those early 2-yo stakes races. And then maybe...the top 10 are determined by graded earnings, and after that there's some kind of point system, selection committee, etc.. Who knows. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I say 3 year old graded earnings should be worth twice as much as two year old. . . First 15 get in that way. . . Then a "promoter's option" for the last five where a panel of experts chooses. . .
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I think it should go by grade. The 2yo stakes should be just as important. I like 2yo races it gets me going for the Derby all summer long.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I don't see the Delta Jackpot being worth as much as the BCJuv. Or more than the Wood for that matter.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The Delta Jackpot should lose its grade
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() I love seeing the big purses, I just don't think it should be a free pass to the Derby. A good 2yo season should be a factor.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() name a good horse that will miss the entry gate this year because they lack graded earnings.
let's be sure there's a problem before we replace an easily understood straight forward qualifying system with some rube goldberg contraption. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
because 20 horses with the most graded stakes earnings is too complex. |