![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Glad you clarified that. I have done some hogging in my past, thanks to some incredibly wonderful beer goggles. Those goggles have been retired, so hopefully so has my hogging ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I completed this mission when I was in college due to those very same goggles, and I have to admit, it was quite fun. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() the usefulness of FTL as well as 2nd Lasix and sometimes 3rd time as a handicapping measure hasnt been relevant to finding prices now that most are aware of the benefit..early on and with certain trainers I know it was masking something else..lets get rid of it and bring the pedigree aspect of "bleeders" back into play
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
When lasix is discussed, it is the horse - only - that should be considered. Not handicapping. Handicappers will have to work around whatever is decided best for the horse. Lasix hasn't been able to mask anything via urine dilution for a long time, detection methods are too good for that.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts |