![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Panty Raid ran in the GI Alabama...Lady Joanne beat her in that race soundly. Then they met up again in the Spinster, and Panty Raid barely beat Lady Joanne. Lady Joanne could run on both surfaces well, but was better on the dirt. I think a horse's breeding has a lot to do with it. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Lady Joanne had already run, and won, on dirt. I didn't need to see her on synthetic to know what she was about. In retrospect, running a "turf like" race in the Spinster sure didn't help her on BC Day when you consider it was her only race in two and a half months before the Distaff. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Lava Man could win on anything, but was best on the dirt. Lady Joanne ran her first race on synthetic, which is when I first mentioned the horse to the board. She was better on the dirt though. Lady Joanne had issues as noted with the break and addition of the front wraps. After the break, she never came close to moving as pretty as she did as a two-year-old. I think she could have been a better horse than she showed when she came back from that long break. So many are like that though... I am not just going to not put a future wager on a horse as talented as Colonel John just because he is running his butt off on the synthetic surface when his breeding is all dirt. If they have the right breeding and performances, running only on the synthetic before the KD is not going to keep me from betting on them necessarily. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Even your emoticons show a complete lack of originality.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
No, I won't because I promised that I wouldn't. |