Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-08-2008, 10:46 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Verlander is by far the best starter on either staff, hell he is the best starter on the majority of teams staffs. But after that the Tigers pitching is ugly. Rogers is old and injury prone and it is unlikely he will rebound beyond slightly below average pitcher at his best. Willis has slumped badly from his 2005 peak when he was outstanding. Though Baseball prospectus seems to feel that the Marlins defense was so bad that it cost him 1/2 run in era, he would still be in the 4.60 area with some other stats that are concerning. His Whip has gone from 1.13 (which is excellent) to 1.60 (which is not). He only allowed 213 hits in 236 innings in 2005 while last year he allowed 241 in 205 innings. His walks have also jumped from 55 in 05 to 87 last year despite the 31 fewer innings. His HR's allowed has also skyrocketed from 11 to 29. Playing with a better defense and in more of a pitchers park may help but there is also the fact that he isnt in the NL anymore and has DH's to contend with also. Nate Robertson is an average pitcher at best. Bonderman is potentially a pretty good pitcher who was excellent in 2006 but was not in 07 and wound up being shutdown late in the season due to a balky elbow. He along with Rogers and Robertson all missed time last year and are injury risks this year also. There is simply nothing else for starters. The bullpen is also a bit shaky and not particularly healthy. Todd Jones is easily the worst closer on an AL contender if not for Joe Borowoski. Fernando Rodney is always hurt (and is again), Zumaya has had 2 major injuries since his great 2006 and is not expected till late May at the earliest. There simply isnt much though Seay is a pretty good lefty only guy. The Tigers made a big splash in improving their lineup but they will need to score lots of runs because they arent going to hold anybody down on days that Verlander doesnt start.

The White Sox made some interesting moves in regards to shoring up the bullpen. Jenks is an elite closer who was lights out last year. Ehren Wasserman was effective in his big league debut last year and the addition of Scott Linebrink and a healthy Dotel gives them the advantage over the Tigers in the pen. I initially thought the Sox signing of Buehrle longterm was a mistake but I was probably wrong. He is what he is, a better than average innings eater who battles and when he keeps the ball down is effective. Vasquez was very good last year. Contreras was shaky last season as he gave up lots more hits than his par. He may have been a little unlucky as his BABIP (batting average balls in play) was an unusually high .335 but he is 57 years old now and supposedly is losing velocity which is a big problem for him. (p.s. -Scavs you finally made a good bet)
Danks is a question mark. He looked good early but faded badly. He is a fly ball pitcher which is a bad fit for the Cell unless you have biting stuff like Vasquez. Danks gave up 28 HR's in 139 innings which is not encouraging. Floyd is a potential average 4th starter. Charlie Haeger is an interesting knuckleballer that may get a shot. He may be the next tim Wakefield which doesn't sound exciting until you see how effective Wakefield has been for so long.

I have to give the overall edge to the Sox simply because the bullpen is a much better bet to succeed. If Willis regains his form, Rogers turns back the clock again, and Bonderman fufills his promise I would give them the edge in starters over the Sox but I doubt that will happen. Alot depends (as it always does) on injuries as neither team has much depth in the rotation and will be plugging in very weak replacements. Plus both teams traded away depth in the minors and dont have very many chips to trade in at the deadline.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-08-2008, 11:16 AM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Verlander is by far the best starter on either staff, hell he is the best starter on the majority of teams staffs. But after that the Tigers pitching is ugly. Rogers is old and injury prone and it is unlikely he will rebound beyond slightly below average pitcher at his best. Willis has slumped badly from his 2005 peak when he was outstanding. Though Baseball prospectus seems to feel that the Marlins defense was so bad that it cost him 1/2 run in era, he would still be in the 4.60 area with some other stats that are concerning. His Whip has gone from 1.13 (which is excellent) to 1.60 (which is not). He only allowed 213 hits in 236 innings in 2005 while last year he allowed 241 in 205 innings. His walks have also jumped from 55 in 05 to 87 last year despite the 31 fewer innings. His HR's allowed has also skyrocketed from 11 to 29. Playing with a better defense and in more of a pitchers park may help but there is also the fact that he isnt in the NL anymore and has DH's to contend with also. Nate Robertson is an average pitcher at best. Bonderman is potentially a pretty good pitcher who was excellent in 2006 but was not in 07 and wound up being shutdown late in the season due to a balky elbow. He along with Rogers and Robertson all missed time last year and are injury risks this year also. There is simply nothing else for starters. The bullpen is also a bit shaky and not particularly healthy. Todd Jones is easily the worst closer on an AL contender if not for Joe Borowoski. Fernando Rodney is always hurt (and is again), Zumaya has had 2 major injuries since his great 2006 and is not expected till late May at the earliest. There simply isnt much though Seay is a pretty good lefty only guy. The Tigers made a big splash in improving their lineup but they will need to score lots of runs because they arent going to hold anybody down on days that Verlander doesnt start.

The White Sox made some interesting moves in regards to shoring up the bullpen. Jenks is an elite closer who was lights out last year. Ehren Wasserman was effective in his big league debut last year and the addition of Scott Linebrink and a healthy Dotel gives them the advantage over the Tigers in the pen. I initially thought the Sox signing of Buehrle longterm was a mistake but I was probably wrong. He is what he is, a better than average innings eater who battles and when he keeps the ball down is effective. Vasquez was very good last year. Contreras was shaky last season as he gave up lots more hits than his par. He may have been a little unlucky as his BABIP (batting average balls in play) was an unusually high .335 but he is 57 years old now and supposedly is losing velocity which is a big problem for him. (p.s. -Scavs you finally made a good bet)
Danks is a question mark. He looked good early but faded badly. He is a fly ball pitcher which is a bad fit for the Cell unless you have biting stuff like Vasquez. Danks gave up 28 HR's in 139 innings which is not encouraging. Floyd is a potential average 4th starter. Charlie Haeger is an interesting knuckleballer that may get a shot. He may be the next tim Wakefield which doesn't sound exciting until you see how effective Wakefield has been for so long.

I have to give the overall edge to the Sox simply because the bullpen is a much better bet to succeed. If Willis regains his form, Rogers turns back the clock again, and Bonderman fufills his promise I would give them the edge in starters over the Sox but I doubt that will happen. Alot depends (as it always does) on injuries as neither team has much depth in the rotation and will be plugging in very weak replacements. Plus both teams traded away depth in the minors and dont have very many chips to trade in at the deadline.

Another EASY for you with the CHarlie Haeger tout..gets shelled every time he comes up.....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2008, 11:49 AM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
Another EASY for you with the CHarlie Haeger tout..gets shelled every time he comes up.....
In o6 he pitched 18 innings, allowed 12 hits and had an era of 3.46 . Last year he pitched 11 innings. It is hard to say he gets shelled every time he comes up. He was very good in AAA in 06. Last year he was not quite as good but still way above average. Very few knuckleballers have MLB experience at 22 like he did. He may not be the next Clemens but he has a shot to be the next Wakefield which would make him easily the WS 3rd best starter.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-08-2008, 12:04 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
In o6 he pitched 18 innings, allowed 12 hits and had an era of 3.46 . Last year he pitched 11 innings. It is hard to say he gets shelled every time he comes up. He was very good in AAA in 06. Last year he was not quite as good but still way above average. Very few knuckleballers have MLB experience at 22 like he did. He may not be the next Clemens but he has a shot to be the next Wakefield which would make him easily the WS 3rd best starter.
Gary Scott was the greatest AAA player of all time for the Cubs. Along with Angel Guzman.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-08-2008, 01:29 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
Gary Scott was the greatest AAA player of all time for the Cubs. Along with Angel Guzman.
Guzman has always been hurt. There is no evidence to suggest that Gary Scott was ever a good baseball player. He was a poor hitter at any league above AA. He was not a good AAA hetter with no power or patience (not many walks). Only a blind person or the Cubs thought he was any good...ever.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-08-2008, 01:31 PM
GBBob GBBob is online now
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Guzman has always been hurt. There is no evidence to suggest that Gary Scott was ever a good baseball player. He was a poor hitter at any league above AA. He was not a good AAA hetter with no power or patience (not many walks). Only a blind person or the Cubs thought he was any good...ever.
On a side Cubs note, there is talk of them playing half a season at the Cell if they remodel Wriggles...Can't wait to see the preppies at 35th and the Dan Ryan looking for The Cubby Bear South
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-08-2008, 12:30 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Verlander is by far the best starter on either staff, hell he is the best starter on the majority of teams staffs. But after that the Tigers pitching is ugly. Rogers is old and injury prone and it is unlikely he will rebound beyond slightly below average pitcher at his best. Willis has slumped badly from his 2005 peak when he was outstanding. Though Baseball prospectus seems to feel that the Marlins defense was so bad that it cost him 1/2 run in era, he would still be in the 4.60 area with some other stats that are concerning. His Whip has gone from 1.13 (which is excellent) to 1.60 (which is not). He only allowed 213 hits in 236 innings in 2005 while last year he allowed 241 in 205 innings. His walks have also jumped from 55 in 05 to 87 last year despite the 31 fewer innings. His HR's allowed has also skyrocketed from 11 to 29. Playing with a better defense and in more of a pitchers park may help but there is also the fact that he isnt in the NL anymore and has DH's to contend with also. Nate Robertson is an average pitcher at best. Bonderman is potentially a pretty good pitcher who was excellent in 2006 but was not in 07 and wound up being shutdown late in the season due to a balky elbow. He along with Rogers and Robertson all missed time last year and are injury risks this year also. There is simply nothing else for starters. The bullpen is also a bit shaky and not particularly healthy. Todd Jones is easily the worst closer on an AL contender if not for Joe Borowoski. Fernando Rodney is always hurt (and is again), Zumaya has had 2 major injuries since his great 2006 and is not expected till late May at the earliest. There simply isnt much though Seay is a pretty good lefty only guy. The Tigers made a big splash in improving their lineup but they will need to score lots of runs because they arent going to hold anybody down on days that Verlander doesnt start.

The White Sox made some interesting moves in regards to shoring up the bullpen. Jenks is an elite closer who was lights out last year. Ehren Wasserman was effective in his big league debut last year and the addition of Scott Linebrink and a healthy Dotel gives them the advantage over the Tigers in the pen. I initially thought the Sox signing of Buehrle longterm was a mistake but I was probably wrong. He is what he is, a better than average innings eater who battles and when he keeps the ball down is effective. Vasquez was very good last year. Contreras was shaky last season as he gave up lots more hits than his par. He may have been a little unlucky as his BABIP (batting average balls in play) was an unusually high .335 but he is 57 years old now and supposedly is losing velocity which is a big problem for him. (p.s. -Scavs you finally made a good bet)
Danks is a question mark. He looked good early but faded badly. He is a fly ball pitcher which is a bad fit for the Cell unless you have biting stuff like Vasquez. Danks gave up 28 HR's in 139 innings which is not encouraging. Floyd is a potential average 4th starter. Charlie Haeger is an interesting knuckleballer that may get a shot. He may be the next tim Wakefield which doesn't sound exciting until you see how effective Wakefield has been for so long.

I have to give the overall edge to the Sox simply because the bullpen is a much better bet to succeed. If Willis regains his form, Rogers turns back the clock again, and Bonderman fufills his promise I would give them the edge in starters over the Sox but I doubt that will happen. Alot depends (as it always does) on injuries as neither team has much depth in the rotation and will be plugging in very weak replacements. Plus both teams traded away depth in the minors and dont have very many chips to trade in at the deadline.

VA bred
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-08-2008, 12:46 PM
GBBob GBBob is online now
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Verlander is by far the best starter on either staff, hell he is the best starter on the majority of teams staffs. But after that the Tigers pitching is ugly. Rogers is old and injury prone and it is unlikely he will rebound beyond slightly below average pitcher at his best. Willis has slumped badly from his 2005 peak when he was outstanding. Though Baseball prospectus seems to feel that the Marlins defense was so bad that it cost him 1/2 run in era, he would still be in the 4.60 area with some other stats that are concerning. His Whip has gone from 1.13 (which is excellent) to 1.60 (which is not). He only allowed 213 hits in 236 innings in 2005 while last year he allowed 241 in 205 innings. His walks have also jumped from 55 in 05 to 87 last year despite the 31 fewer innings. His HR's allowed has also skyrocketed from 11 to 29. Playing with a better defense and in more of a pitchers park may help but there is also the fact that he isnt in the NL anymore and has DH's to contend with also. Nate Robertson is an average pitcher at best. Bonderman is potentially a pretty good pitcher who was excellent in 2006 but was not in 07 and wound up being shutdown late in the season due to a balky elbow. He along with Rogers and Robertson all missed time last year and are injury risks this year also. There is simply nothing else for starters. The bullpen is also a bit shaky and not particularly healthy. Todd Jones is easily the worst closer on an AL contender if not for Joe Borowoski. Fernando Rodney is always hurt (and is again), Zumaya has had 2 major injuries since his great 2006 and is not expected till late May at the earliest. There simply isnt much though Seay is a pretty good lefty only guy. The Tigers made a big splash in improving their lineup but they will need to score lots of runs because they arent going to hold anybody down on days that Verlander doesnt start.

The White Sox made some interesting moves in regards to shoring up the bullpen. Jenks is an elite closer who was lights out last year. Ehren Wasserman was effective in his big league debut last year and the addition of Scott Linebrink and a healthy Dotel gives them the advantage over the Tigers in the pen. I initially thought the Sox signing of Buehrle longterm was a mistake but I was probably wrong. He is what he is, a better than average innings eater who battles and when he keeps the ball down is effective. Vasquez was very good last year. Contreras was shaky last season as he gave up lots more hits than his par. He may have been a little unlucky as his BABIP (batting average balls in play) was an unusually high .335 but he is 57 years old now and supposedly is losing velocity which is a big problem for him. (p.s. -Scavs you finally made a good bet)Danks is a question mark. He looked good early but faded badly. He is a fly ball pitcher which is a bad fit for the Cell unless you have biting stuff like Vasquez. Danks gave up 28 HR's in 139 innings which is not encouraging. Floyd is a potential average 4th starter. Charlie Haeger is an interesting knuckleballer that may get a shot. He may be the next tim Wakefield which doesn't sound exciting until you see how effective Wakefield has been for so long.

I have to give the overall edge to the Sox simply because the bullpen is a much better bet to succeed. If Willis regains his form, Rogers turns back the clock again, and Bonderman fufills his promise I would give them the edge in starters over the Sox but I doubt that will happen. Alot depends (as it always does) on injuries as neither team has much depth in the rotation and will be plugging in very weak replacements. Plus both teams traded away depth in the minors and dont have very many chips to trade in at the deadline.
That's all you could come up with?..lol

OK..If the bet was if Jose was going to win 15 or not, then I'd say it was a good bet for Scavs. I think the key to his success is throwing strikes and especially throwing the splitter for strikes. His velocity, or lack of, gets him in trouble when he's wild. Plus..he loses focus easily and that divorce he went through LY really affected him. Now he's free to pick up two hotties on the road whenever he wants ( which I saw him do in Baltimore and they were outstanding I might add) and stay focused on the mound. Barring a freak injury, I think he easily makes it to August and will have a very good year.

But..we shall see..
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-08-2008, 01:21 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob
That's all you could come up with?..lol

OK..If the bet was if Jose was going to win 15 or not, then I'd say it was a good bet for Scavs. I think the key to his success is throwing strikes and especially throwing the splitter for strikes. His velocity, or lack of, gets him in trouble when he's wild. Plus..he loses focus easily and that divorce he went through LY really affected him. Now he's free to pick up two hotties on the road whenever he wants ( which I saw him do in Baltimore and they were outstanding I might add) and stay focused on the mound. Barring a freak injury, I think he easily makes it to August and will have a very good year.

But..we shall see..
I guess misunderstood the bet. I thought that he had to win 15 which is pretty shaky.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-08-2008, 01:24 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

I don't even know the bet, all I know is I get to eat some garlic Parmeasan wings, most likely EITHER WAY
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-08-2008, 01:30 PM
Cannon Shell's Avatar
Cannon Shell Cannon Shell is offline
Sha Tin
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,855
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
I don't even know the bet, all I know is I get to eat some garlic Parmeasan wings, most likely EITHER WAY
Who is Joanna?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-08-2008, 01:34 PM
Scav Scav is offline
Saratoga
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northwest of The Chi
Posts: 16,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cannon Shell
Who is Joanna?
Just wait until you come up here
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-08-2008, 01:38 PM
GBBob GBBob is online now
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scav
Just wait until you come up here
She's the horse masseuse in training that I was telling you about..

oh my..we have to get her on the payroll at AP this summer...She is the definition of HOT-Walker..and she loves horses
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.