That is a bunch of crap. First of all we are talking about individuals named in a private investigation santioned and paid for by private business. This was not based upon a government investigation and as such the questionable tactics of investigators in using possibile immunity in order to provide information for a private investigation is unusual to say the least. Secondly, there are only minor violations (if any, I still have never been shown that using HGH is a crime) by the alleged users of the drugs, not the suppliers. Though I am not a lawyer I would find it strange that a governing body would concern itself not with the suppliers of the drug but the users? Where was Congress during the late 80's when baseball players were being brought in front of a court in PA for cocaine use? I would have to say that if given the choice between HGH and cocaine, the latter would be a much more serious and dangerous drug. However Congress wasnt sticking its nose in then. This isnt about the suppliers, they got immunity to finger the users. That is like arresting the drug kingpin and giving him immunity to tell who was using. It seems odd to me. Peegarden, this is not about the production and distribution of HGH. That would make sense. The way this has played out does not.
|
02-18-2008, 10:08 PM
Threaded Mode