Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-30-2008, 09:21 PM
pdrift1's Avatar
pdrift1 pdrift1 is offline
Hippodrome Bluebonnets
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SniperSB23
I don't think the contract is that big of an issue. He's basically going to get what Barry Zito got on the open market which the Mets were prepared to pay but not for Zito. So the Mets traded one good OF prospect who needs to learn plate discipline (which wasn't going to be possible with the Mets next year), a 25yo pitcher who has already had Tommy John surgery, and two other pitching prospects that likely would have never made the rotation with Santana, Maine, Perez, and Pelfrey likely around for a while. In exchange they upgraded from Barry Zito to Johan Santana for about the same money. I'm just shocked they pulled this off without any of Reyes, Pelfrey, Heilman, or Fernando Martinez involved.
zito-7 years 126 mil
santana-6 years 150 mil

you have to admit there is going to be a difference, and the mets are cringeing at the thought of dealing this out, but have no choice,

santanas agent has them by the balls and after the collapse last year the mets fans want results. hes going to get more then zito is by far
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-31-2008, 07:39 AM
pmayjr's Avatar
pmayjr pmayjr is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canterbury Park- 3rd Floor Clubhouse
Posts: 1,603
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdrift1
zito-7 years 126 mil
santana-6 years 150 mil

you have to admit there is going to be a difference, and the mets are cringeing at the thought of dealing this out, but have no choice,

santanas agent has them by the balls and after the collapse last year the mets fans want results. hes going to get more then zito is by far
I kinda disagree with this for 2 reasons-
1) the Mets know what they're getting into by making this trade
2) I wasn't naive to the fact that after the deal was all said and done- no matter what team he got traded to, or even if the Twins somehow retained him, that he's gonna be the 2nd highest paid player in baseball behind A-Rod.
__________________
Facebook- Peter May Jr.
Twitter- @pmayjr
You wouldn't be ballin' if your name was Spauldin'
If y'all fresh to death, then I'm deceased...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-31-2008, 10:53 AM
pdrift1's Avatar
pdrift1 pdrift1 is offline
Hippodrome Bluebonnets
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmayjr
I kinda disagree with this for 2 reasons-
1) the Mets know what they're getting into by making this trade
2) I wasn't naive to the fact that after the deal was all said and done- no matter what team he got traded to, or even if the Twins somehow retained him, that he's gonna be the 2nd highest paid player in baseball behind A-Rod.
thats what i was getting at. i thought all along he was getting more then zito. i knew the mets were going to have to cough up the highest price for any pitcher in mlb with this.but they do have a little less leverage then other teams due to the circumstances of the mets
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.