Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2008, 06:01 PM
miraja2's Avatar
miraja2 miraja2 is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,157
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind
Now, did you repeat " dirt " twice to try and convince us or yourself?

This was not a dirt race, nor should it be confused as one, and like every prep run on synthetic surface, it has little to no bearing on any races the participants run on actual dirt.

Call it a handicapping challenge, but this year's KY Derby will be filled with the new challenge of figuring out how some horses will do in their actual first start on dirt. The unfortunate thing is to think of the excluded horses that may well have impacted the Derbies of the future had they had the proper surface to run on earlier in their careers. But, the good news is that many of the non-dirt horses that are confused as actual dirt horses will be thoroughly exposed in Louisville on an annual basis.

Anybody that disagrees with this should look at the winner of this year's Sunshine Millions Classic. It aint dirt.
Oh yeah. I actually forgot that GG was synthetic because I hardly ever watch (or follow) races there.
Obviously these surfaces are very diffrerent from dirt, but the real confusing part for me is that they are so different from each other too. For awhile I just considered synthetic surfaces as a "third surface"....but even that isn't accurate, because...well just look at the three SoCal tracks with synthetic surfaces.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-29-2008, 02:11 AM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by miraja2
For awhile I just considered synthetic surfaces as a "third surface"....but even that isn't accurate, because...well just look at the three SoCal tracks with synthetic surfaces.
Actually, in my opinion, it is still pretty accurate. Sure, like dirt and turf, no two tracks are exactly the same. The general tendencies of the synthetic tracks are very much the same however, regardless of the final times.
__________________
@TimeformUSfigs
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-29-2008, 05:09 AM
Indian Charlie's Avatar
Indian Charlie Indian Charlie is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
Actually, in my opinion, it is still pretty accurate. Sure, like dirt and turf, no two tracks are exactly the same. The general tendencies of the synthetic tracks are very much the same however, regardless of the final times.
I don't know. I see plenty of dirt loving horses that abhor poly yet run far less abysmally over cushion than over poly.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2008, 08:29 AM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

What I mean is that you simply have to go slower early than you on dirt, whether tapeta, cushion, or polytrack. Some you must go slower than others of course, but this isn't any different than dirt courses. The longer the distance, the greater the change from dirt.

As for the horse in this thread, he was given a meager 74 Beyer. Derby? Not even the TuP version.
__________________
@TimeformUSfigs
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.