Commentator.. nice!

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

I just think there is a basic misunderstanding by Sniper and King Glorious about Commentator. You both seem completely oblivious to his physical issues. This is a 7YO that just made his 16th career start. Think about that for a while....a long while. You both seem to be mapping out a season for a horse that is lucky to be able to make four starts a year. Sniper thinks he should be shipping down to New Orleans to run in the Minshaft in a few weeks as a prep for, maybe, the NO Handicap. I'm not exactly, to say the least, Mr. Backstretch, but I know enough to understand how ridiculous it would be to ship him and run him that ambitiously. It's very early in the year. There are plenty of races and if handled carefully perhaps, just perhaps, he will be able to take a shot in some of the more fitting spots. I am sure Zito would love to try him going longer again, but in order for that to happen I imagine he has to be handled very carefully. I hate the expression " they're not machines " but I do think it is very fitting in this particular case.

Miraja is right. Commentator is a horse that at times has run awe inspiring fast races. We don't see this very often anymore. He's a 7YO with a lifetime of issues. It's a miracle he's still running even occasionally well. It seems more fitting to be appreciating whatever we get out of him instead of arguing about where he's best spotted. Just hope he makes another start....and another.....

I don't think it's a misunderstanding on my part. I understand that there are likely to only be a few opportunities to run him each year because of his physical issues. For that reason, I completely agree with you that it wouldn't make much sense to ship to New Orleans. They would be lucky to make even one of the two races and chances are very slim that they'd make both. I have not at all mapped out a campaign for what they should be trying to make with him. I only said that in the few times a year that he will be able to run, I'd like to see him placed in spots that would better allow him to show his best abilities. I think Commentator is an extremely talented horse, arguably one of the 10 best of the past decade. But I don't think they are doing him any favors by placing him in sprints. He's run some very fast sprints but he's done it under optimal circumstances for him. He's not once shown the ability to contend with true top level sprinters on the front end and still have the ability to finish. I don't see how anyone can't look at his record and see that. Last year for example, if they wanted to bring him back off of the layoff to run in the BC, the Dirt Mile, IMO, would have been a better fit than the Sprint. So I don't think there is a misunderstanding about him at all. I understand that he's a very talented and very fragile horse.

[cakes44]

Originally Posted by King Glorious

I think Commentator is an extremely talented horse, arguably one of the 10 best of the past decade.

Whoa now. Easy there tiger.

[King Glorious]

Originally Posted by cakes44

Whoa now. Easy there tiger.

It's hard to say because I don't think he's been given the chance over the last couple of years to show his best stuff. I think had they focused on 8-9f races for him, we'd have seem some special stuff.

[cakes44]

He would have finished 3rd at best in the BC Dirt Mile this year if he ran.

[SniperSB23]

Originally Posted by cakes44

Whoa now. Easy there tiger.

How many horses this decade have three Beyers of 119+? Not many others besides Ghostzapper and Commentator.

[ateamstupid]

Haven't we been here before? What exactly did Commentator do yesterday that he hasn't already done? He got away with a soft quarter and aired in very fast time in a race essentially written for him. That hasn't happened before. The horse is seven years old and still has never dueled through fast splits with a top-flight horse and come out on top. He remains a very talented quitter to me until he proves otherwise.

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Haven't we been here before? What exactly did Commentator do yesterday that he hasn't already done? He got away with a soft quarter and aired in very fast time in a race essentially written for him. That hasn't happened before. The horse is seven years old and still has never dueled through fast splits with a top-flight horse and come out on top. He remains a very talented quitter to me until he proves otherwise.

Yep.
But at 7 damn good.

From my earlier post:

Same old same old
with this horse.
Give em an easy run
in the first part of a race,
uncontested early, he looks
like a monster.

He can win sprints.
If they go 22.5, 46 and he
leads these fractions.
Good luck with that.

[ateamstupid]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

A 10 for 16 horse can't be called a quitter.

Um, why not? He throws in the towel every time he doesn't get things his way. That's a quitter, I don't care what his record is.

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by ateamstupid

Um, why not? He throws in the towel every time he doesn't get things his way. That's a quitter, I don't care what his record is.

In the Whitney he was certainly loose on the lead down the backstretch, but Saint Liam did push him a bit early and Commentator ran the opening half in :46 2/5. That doesn't strike me as ideal for a 9f race.
He certainly had a good trip that day, but so did the the HOY that couldn't get by him in the stretch.

Originally Posted by miraja2

In the Whitney he was certainly loose on the lead down the backstretch, but Saint Liam did push him a bit early and Commentator ran the opening half in :46 2/5. That doesn't strike me as ideal for a 9f race.
He certainly had a good trip that day, but so did the the HOY that couldn't get by him in the stretch.

Look at the Woodward.
Tried to rate em,
St. Liam passed him
without asking. Other horses
ahead early and he is toast.



He is a very good
1-dimensional horse.

[whodey17]

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

How many horses this decade have three Beyers of 119+? Not many others besides Ghostzapper and Commentator.

Are you suggesting that Commentator could beat Ghostzapper or come close to beating him in a race since they both have beyers of 119+? We all know that beyers are purely subjective.

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

How many horses this decade have three Beyers of 119+? Not many others besides Ghostzapper and Commentator.

Two of Commentators three big figures came with ridiculiously easy trips - and his third big figure, was one that many felt was a questionable number on the high side.

I believe Left Bank ran four of 118 or greater. though two of the four were 118's.

Congaree had a pair of 120's and a 118

Swept Overboard had a pair of 122's.

Kona Gold had a 123, 119, 118, 117

A lot of close but not quite's.

[SniperSB23]

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Two of Commentators three big figures came with ridiculiously easy trips - and his third big figure, was one that many felt was a questionable number on the high side.

I believe Left Bank ran four of 118 or greater. though two of the four were 118's.

Congaree had a pair of 120's and a 118

Swept Overboard had a pair of 122's.

Kona Gold had a 123, 119, 118, 117

A lot of close but not quite's.

Which is why I wouldn't personally put him in my top ten for the decade but I don't think anyone should have a major problem with someone putting the horse in their top ten for the decade. Especially considering that only he and Ghostzapper have gone 119+ three times no matter the circumstances.

[blackthroatedwind]

Originally Posted by SniperSB23

Which is why I wouldn't personally put him in my top ten for the decade but I don't think anyone should have a major problem with someone putting the horse in their top ten for the decade. Especially considering that only he and Ghostzapper have gone 119+ three times no matter the circumstances.

When you quote his nonsense it completely defeats the purpose of my having him on ignore.

[philcski]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

When you quote his nonsense it completely defeats the purpose of my having him on ignore.

LOL

[The Indomitable DrugS]

Originally Posted by blackthroatedwind

When you quote his nonsense it completely defeats the purpose of my having him on ignore.

Sometimes I feel like this whole board would be a lot more entertaining if I blocked everyone but me.

[miraja2]

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

I laughed.

Me too.