Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > Joe Silverio Simulcast Center
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-15-2008, 09:23 AM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SentToStud
There's still more than one way to be successful.

And, even if picking winners is overrated, you still need to be right at some point, whether it's making a horse an A,B,C or X in multis or betting against a short priced horse in a single race.

A couple of the better players I know eschew the multi-race wagers and focus on single race situations to bet strongly against a short-priced, negative-opinion horse mostly through the tri and super pools. Just like the p-4 or p-6 players, they have to be right about their opinion as well as their ticket structure. But they prefer betting this strategy vs being shoe-horned into needing to be right (at least to some extent) about a leg of a p-4 that is, to them, largely undecipherable.

You can still win using different strategies.
Obviously I agree. Being right somewhere will always be important, and as you said better than I did, that being right will often be in who you are betting against and how you do it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-15-2008, 10:05 AM
Bobby Fischer's Avatar
Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,401
Default

For a site that is minimal on B.S., there are several really good cappers here.

If anyone is interested, I watched the replay for the Fairgrounds 6th, and there didn't appear to be any advantage in the first 15 seconds. Cheap speed actually went out first. Couldn't be past posting/late posting. I think the best guess is that the connections Amoss/Maggi Moss felt they had a move-up and put between $3-5k to win (missed the place/show action) as they were loading the gate. They didn't want to influence the public by making their horse the favorite the whole time. That info doesn't help anyone, but the next time you think you have an Amoss move-up, it is something to look for in the last few odds bumps.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-15-2008, 11:43 AM
hoovesupsideyourhead's Avatar
hoovesupsideyourhead hoovesupsideyourhead is offline
"The Kentucky Killing Machine"
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: florida
Posts: 16,278
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Fischer
For a site that is minimal on B.S., there are several really good cappers here.

If anyone is interested, I watched the replay for the Fairgrounds 6th, and there didn't appear to be any advantage in the first 15 seconds. Cheap speed actually went out first. Couldn't be past posting/late posting. I think the best guess is that the connections Amoss/Maggi Moss felt they had a move-up and put between $3-5k to win (missed the place/show action) as they were loading the gate. They didn't want to influence the public by making their horse the favorite the whole time. That info doesn't help anyone, but the next time you think you have an Amoss move-up, it is something to look for in the last few odds bumps.
why do you think it was the connections betting......
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-15-2008, 12:56 PM
Bobby Fischer's Avatar
Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hoovesupsideyourhead
why do you think it was the connections betting......
I think they knew that the horse was right. May have been a case of a sound, willing horse going from Hay/Oats/Water in a barn that doesn't win a lot -to top nutrition available in a high% barn.

Maybe the money came in very weird, or there is a lucky hunch player or a great pro, but of the informed players the most likely scenarios lead to Amoss.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-15-2008, 05:32 PM
Bobby Fischer's Avatar
Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,401
Default $erious $tuff

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Are you really serious with this stuff?
serious question?


the 2 horse win bet was not as efficient as possible. Had it been perfect it would have been $115/$85 ratio (instead of $105/$95) out of the $200. At 2.1-1 and allowing for me to naturally be off a few dollars here or there, the pool change cost me about $20 additional profit.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-15-2008, 08:17 PM
Bobby Fischer's Avatar
Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
... How on earth is it a wise move to invest $200 into a race and basically bet short priced horses? The object is to win money and IMO that strategy is a sure fire way to lose in the long run.
Good question.

For that race it came down to deciding how likely I felt I would win with those two horses.
I was confident and felt that I had about 65% chance of winning covered.

The final price that I got from final odds would break even if I win 56% of the time.
Meaning as long as my opinion of confidence is accurate and higher than the 56% price, I am getting a good opportunity.

If I can buy a gallon of gas and a good cup of coffee for under $3.50 I take it.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.