Andrea Yates found not gulity!

[Downthestretch55]

Originally Posted by 2MinsToPost

well yeah, I don't have the background that you two have so my opinion is based strictly on EMOTION and not Facts as they lie. I see your point and it is well received. Thank goodness these days I am open to learning and understanding and not black and white.

Curt,
Let me tell you...I was angry as HELL about the deaths of those kids...her own children!!! My own emotions told me to say, "Kill her the same way she killed her kids."
Then, I heard a small voice inside that said, "There's more to this than you understand, Wayne."

So, it's really not for me to judge.
The more I see, the less black or white exists...only shades of grey.

DTS

The jury realized the torture the entire family is going thru. This lady probably wants to die on alternate days anyway. Nothing worse could be done to all involved. Jury is giving her a chance to live without constant suffering. She will suffer for the rest of her life, maybe it will be tolerable some days. One can only hope. A totally sad situation.

[irishtrekker]

I found it remarkable that her husband supported the ruling, too -- there aren't many people in the middle of things like this who could see the "bigger picture" and recognize what's legitimately best for all involved.

I worked in prisons, too, although in more of an outreach/tutoring capacity and not for nearly as long as you, Somer...but it's amazing how much your perspective changes when you spend time behind those walls. I have a really difficult time explaining it to people who've never been there...but my views on incarceration are considerably more thought-out and nuanced than they would ever be if I hadn't seen it. It's one of the most hidden-away parts of society, and I'm not sure that's right.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by irishtrekker

I found it remarkable that her husband supported the ruling, too -- there aren't many people in the middle of things like this who could see the "bigger picture" and recognize what's legitimately best for all involved.

I worked in prisons, too, although in more of an outreach/tutoring capacity and not for nearly as long as you, Somer...but it's amazing how much your perspective changes when you spend time behind those walls. I have a really difficult time explaining it to people who've never been there...but my views on incarceration are considerably more thought-out and nuanced than they would ever be if I hadn't seen it. It's one of the most hidden-away parts of society, and I'm not sure that's right.

I agree totally! People hear about the cable TV and the "special treatment" and some of that does indeed go on and is frustrating but the big picture...the one where decent folks are turned into animals, isn't seen. Loss of freedom is the price one pays for violating the laws of society but subjecting folks to brutality should never be acceptable! There are a lot of good people who work in our prisons, it takes a strong will to step through those gates every day...but the environment is NOT one of rehabilitation but learning to be more vicious, more uncaring, more dangerous...and when those folks get out, and most do...we've done nothing but created our own monsters! And sending mentally ill folks into that world....well, it's simply wrong!

[Seattleallstar]

Just caught up on this thread, ive been occupied posting other garbage. I'll try to stop Frosty. Anyways,it is well known among the mental health community that Andrea Yates had a long documented history of schizophrenia before she ever drowned her children. She was also highly delusional at the time of the crime. This is not like the ****ing Twinkie defense, this is legitimate. I feel much better that her initial trial verdict of guilty is now modified. It isn't that she just had postpartum depression she had untreated schizophrenia. Postpartum depression is an afterthought. I don't think she should go free guys, but I do believe she is very different than most people who commit murder.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by Seattleallstar

Just caught up on this thread, ive been occupied posting other garbage. I'll try to stop Frosty. Anyways,it is well known among the mental health community that Andrea Yates had a long documented history of schizophrenia before she ever drowned her children. She was also highly delusional at the time of the crime. This is not like the ****ing Twinkie defense, this is legitimate. I feel much better that her initial trial verdict of guilty is now modified. It isn't that she just had postpartum depression she had untreated schizophrenia. Postpartum depression is an afterthought. I don't think she should go free guys, but I do believe she is very different than most people who commit murder.

I agree Jerry....we can't generalize simply because some people have used a bogus insanity defense in the past. Gotta remember the only reason it sometimes works is that the vast majority of the time, the symptoms are real!

[SentToStud]

I can't believe that a mother would kill her five children without truly being insane. Two things bother me about the case.... 1, If her custody had been challenged before the killings, I assume her legal strategy would have been much different and, ... 2, It's not hard to expect to see some abuse of this kind of defense.

Just tragic stuff. I trust the jury to have done the right thing.