Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Sports Bar & Grill
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-11-2007, 05:40 PM
somerfrost's Avatar
somerfrost somerfrost is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chambersburg, Pa
Posts: 4,635
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whodey17
Under his jersey he had a black shirt with white writing that read - "Free Mike Vick."


I understand, and I agree he has every right to express his opinion. As a PETA member and dog lover, I disagree but his opinion is as valid to him as mine is to me. I like the Dixie Chicks, didn't change my mind about their music when they expressed their opinion of Bush, I love the music of Heart, even though the Wilson sisters staged a benefit for Charlie Manson...bottom line, we don't toss out the First Amendment just cause we disagree with someone.
__________________
"Always be yourself...unless you suck!"
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-11-2007, 05:44 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

wonder if the nfl will get fine happy with some of the falcons. remember the hubbub over mcmahons head band? i doubt free mike vick is on the uniform list as allowable wear.

as for free speech, it doesn't apply in the nfl--it costs you 25 grand to give your opinion about the referees.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-11-2007, 06:11 PM
whodey17's Avatar
whodey17 whodey17 is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: indy
Posts: 2,318
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
wonder if the nfl will get fine happy with some of the falcons. remember the hubbub over mcmahons head band? i doubt free mike vick is on the uniform list as allowable wear.

as for free speech, it doesn't apply in the nfl--it costs you 25 grand to give your opinion about the referees.
I can understand protecting the refs. There cannot be any thought of a ref fixing a game because a player blasted him in the media. Protecting the refs protects the integrity of the game. What was on White's shirt (no matter your opinion) does not to hurt the integrity of the game.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-11-2007, 06:39 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,940
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whodey17
I can understand protecting the refs. There cannot be any thought of a ref fixing a game because a player blasted him in the media. Protecting the refs protects the integrity of the game. What was on White's shirt (no matter your opinion) does not to hurt the integrity of the game.
i can't. if a ref blows a call, why shouldn't he be called on it? if someone asks your opinion, it should be allowed.
crazy that your free speech ends at the coliseum door.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-11-2007, 06:41 PM
whodey17's Avatar
whodey17 whodey17 is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: indy
Posts: 2,318
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danzig
i can't. if a ref blows a call, why shouldn't he be called on it? if someone asks your opinion, it should be allowed.
crazy that your free speech ends at the coliseum door.
It does not end of at the coliseum door. But you cant have players and refs going at each other in the media. I wish they could and would support such action, but I can understand the NFL's view.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-11-2007, 07:39 PM
Bigsmc's Avatar
Bigsmc Bigsmc is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,577
Default

Last I checked, everybody in the South eats fried chicken.

Hyper-sensitive society we live in.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.