Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2007, 05:11 PM
ALostTexan's Avatar
ALostTexan ALostTexan is offline
Sheepshead Bay
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,101
Default

Just read about this. Seems like if the prosecution was going to try to prove that these guys stopped 27 horses, they would have some sort of case, but the defendents didn't even have to testify.

If that was the case, I think that Fallon should have a case to sue for this. At least in the US he would, anyway...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-07-2007, 08:19 PM
hi_im_god's Avatar
hi_im_god hi_im_god is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,043
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ALostTexan
Just read about this. Seems like if the prosecution was going to try to prove that these guys stopped 27 horses, they would have some sort of case, but the defendents didn't even have to testify.

If that was the case, I think that Fallon should have a case to sue for this. At least in the US he would, anyway...
"If that was the case, I think that Fallon should have a case to sue for this. At least in the US he would, anyway..."

no he wouldn't.

no. no. no. no. no.
















okay.

so if a government entity gives you permission to bring a civil action against them you could do that.

theoretically.

in a universe where prosecuters admit they brought a case to court in bad faith.

and want to get sued.

sovereign immunity is alive and well. you still can't sue the king without his permission.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2007, 02:23 PM
Pedigree Ann's Avatar
Pedigree Ann Pedigree Ann is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 1,776
Default

But he may well have a case against the British Horseracing Board, which suspended him for more than a year for being charged, not convicted, thus depriving him of the opportunity to ply his trade in Britain. He remained licensed in Ireland and France and rode without any accusations of pulling horses in those jurisdictions.

It is telling that the prosecution couldn't get a UK racing authority to testify that horses were being pulled in the questioned races, but had to import one from Australia, who admitted in court that he knew nothing about UK racing rules. They showed one of the 'evidence' races, wherein Fallon took his horse off to a long lead, looked to have the race in the bag late on and did a bit of grandstanding, only to be nipped at the wire. A bonehead move, a bad ride, but nothing us racefans haven't seen before. At least he apologised after the race.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-10-2007, 10:11 PM
ALostTexan's Avatar
ALostTexan ALostTexan is offline
Sheepshead Bay
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,101
Default

I would say his 'creditability' has taken a hit today, though.

Fallon Positive for Cocaine

I really hope he can get his stuff together. Great jockey, but as many messes as P. Val...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-10-2007, 11:44 PM
goingtothewhip's Avatar
goingtothewhip goingtothewhip is offline
Morris Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 143
Default

LoL. My boy charlie indeed.


Kidding aside, its troubling that he couldn't pass a test when im sure he knew he might be tested and the short time table that you can test pos for Coke. Its 3 days at best. Given the fast metabolism that I would think is essential for being a jockey... he made a very poor choice.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.