HOF First Time Nominees...cough, cough

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Buckner HOF Monitor: Batting - 69.5 (Likely HOFer > 100)

Shows how off you are.Garvey has a 130.5 rating.How dare you mention Garvey and Buckner together.That is low.Staub is even ranked lower than Buckner 59.0 (Likely HOFer > 100.)These guys played very average for a long time,and you even mention them as better than Garvey at anything? Just because they played longer? You're a whack when it comes to HOF. That's not an opinion.That's a fact.You just compared a guy with a 130.5 to guys with less than 70.They say 130 is a virtual cinch to get in.Obviously it isn't,but a 130.5 is far from not being good enough(they just said it should be easily good enough..not borderline.)