Final Verdict ... Fog Is A Fraud

Originally Posted by DaHoss9698

Your analogy is ridiculous. So if a two year old wins 8 straight that's not impressive because he/she ran against only 2 year olds. If a claimer wins 10 straight it's not impressive because it was against claimers. Again last year Gilchrist told EVERYONE where he was going. I just have a hard time comparing a grade I winner of more than a million dollars, to a deceased comedian.

This thread wasn't prompted by people saying that Lost In The Fog was "impressive" ... it was prompted by people saying that he was "great."

I haven't seen anyone say that Lost In The Fog's winning streak wasn't impressive ... just some folks ... myself included ... saying that such a winning streak against mediocre opponents doesn't equate to greatness.

I stand by my brilliant analogy.