Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-16-2006, 11:25 AM
Pointg5 Pointg5 is offline
Sheepshead Bay
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,096
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
Considering that Ellis is 33% off the layoff, I highly doubt the horse will need a race.

DM is a Champion, but that was a year and a half ago, other than Bellamy Road and Flower Alley that wasn't a great group and he didn't face those two, there's enough concern to say he's an automatic here...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-16-2006, 11:44 AM
Gander Gander is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,336
Default

33% off a layoff is a very misleading stat. How many of those horses have been laid off 1.5 years and havent run as an older horse? Against a field with 2 horses who have races that are consistently better than the horse who is making the start off the layoff?

Not saying its impossible but certainly nowhere near the odds that you'll have to swallow. The more I look at this race the more I like Yeshesapistol at what figures to be the only "bettable odds". Areyoutalkingtome looms huge in here but hard to take at around 8/5.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-16-2006, 12:38 PM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,943
Default

ah yes, another good day for racing, with an intriguing race on each coast.
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-16-2006, 12:55 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gander
33% off a layoff is a very misleading stat. How many of those horses have been laid off 1.5 years and havent run as an older horse? Against a field with 2 horses who have races that are consistently better than the horse who is making the start off the layoff?

Not saying its impossible but certainly nowhere near the odds that you'll have to swallow. The more I look at this race the more I like Yeshesapistol at what figures to be the only "bettable odds". Areyoutalkingtome looms huge in here but hard to take at around 8/5.
There are two horses that are better than the horse coming off the layoff? What are you smoking? You could buy either one of those horses for $100,000. You couldn't buy DM for $1 million. DM is a Breeeder's Cup caliber horse. Ron says he is the best horse he has ever trained by far. Ron has trained a ton of Grade I horses and Ron is not one to talk up his horses.
Doug O'Neil trains the two horses that you think are better than DM. I can guarantee you that even Doug would tell you that neither of his two horses are in the league of DM. I can practically guarantee you that Doug would have never entered either of his horses in this race if he knew that DM was running. I'm sure he'd scratch them if he could but it's not easy to get a horse scratched in a 5 horse field. You actually need your vet to lie and say that there is something wrong with the horse. Don't get me wrong, guys do it but it's somewhat of a hassle. There is no way that he will be able to get both horses scratched.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-16-2006, 02:50 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rupert Pupkin
There are two horses that are better than the horse coming off the layoff? What are you smoking? You could buy either one of those horses for $100,000. You couldn't buy DM for $1 million. DM is a Breeeder's Cup caliber horse. Ron says he is the best horse he has ever trained by far. Ron has trained a ton of Grade I horses and Ron is not one to talk up his horses.
Doug O'Neil trains the two horses that you think are better than DM. I can guarantee you that even Doug would tell you that neither of his two horses are in the league of DM. I can practically guarantee you that Doug would have never entered either of his horses in this race if he knew that DM was running. I'm sure he'd scratch them if he could but it's not easy to get a horse scratched in a 5 horse field. You actually need your vet to lie and say that there is something wrong with the horse. Don't get me wrong, guys do it but it's somewhat of a hassle. There is no way that he will be able to get both horses scratched.
It's no surprise that O'Neil scratched Areyoutalkintome. I'm sure he would scratch the other horse too if he could. That was why Ron kept it a secret that DM was running. He knew the race would never go if the other trainers knew he was running.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-16-2006, 12:59 PM
Rupert Pupkin Rupert Pupkin is offline
Del Mar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,102
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gander
33% off a layoff is a very misleading stat. How many of those horses have been laid off 1.5 years and havent run as an older horse? Against a field with 2 horses who have races that are consistently better than the horse who is making the start off the layoff?

Not saying its impossible but certainly nowhere near the odds that you'll have to swallow. The more I look at this race the more I like Yeshesapistol at what figures to be the only "bettable odds". Areyoutalkingtome looms huge in here but hard to take at around 8/5.
You are right that the 33% stat is misleading. If all of Ellis's horses were as good as DM, the stat would be more like 60%. Many of his horses coming off layoffs are not great horses.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.