Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-01-2007, 06:16 PM
Riot's Avatar
Riot Riot is offline
Keeneland
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 14,153
Default

Quote:
Nobody knew how the synthetic surfaces would playout i.e. kind to plodders and a disadvantage to speed during the yearling sales of 2006
.

Does anybody have figures on Kee, Turf, Arlington, or even first days of Del Mar, regarding what percentage of horses have won from front, stalking, closing? I've seen some published, can't recall where.
__________________
"Have the clean racing people run any ads explaining that giving a horse a Starbucks and a chocolate poppyseed muffin for breakfast would likely result in a ten year suspension for the trainer?" - Dr. Andrew Roberts
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-01-2007, 06:21 PM
jwkniska's Avatar
jwkniska jwkniska is offline
Fairgrounds
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Mt. Prospect, IL (AP)
Posts: 1,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
.

Does anybody have figures on Kee, Turf, Arlington, or even first days of Del Mar, regarding what percentage of horses have won from front, stalking, closing? I've seen some published, can't recall where.
The last I saw from AP, it was about 35% closers, 25% stalkers, 20% front end and the rest were pressers.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-01-2007, 07:50 PM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwkniska
The last I saw from AP, it was about 35% closers, 25% stalkers, 20% front end and the rest were pressers.

AP Through July 22:

Closers- 33%
Stalkers 25%
Pressers: 17%
Speed: 25%

Winning Margin:

1/2 length or less: 30%
3/4-2: 34%
2 1/4- 4: 22%
4 1/2+ 14%

Outside: 54%
Inside: 46%

Chalk: 29%
3-1 or less: 48%
7-2 to 9-1: 34%
10-1 + 18%

Average Payoff
Poly: $15.00
Turf: $13.39
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-01-2007, 09:58 PM
ELA ELA is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: NY/NJ
Posts: 1,293
Default

More on this story . . .

http://www.drf.com/news/article/87205.html

I see both sides of the fence on this. However, as much as I hate to say it, I think a good amount of the criticism is "crying" -- and that's not meant as criticism.

The bettor is used to, wants, is looking for, etc. -- a bias, pattern, trend, whatever you want to call it. Reliability is something that could be ideal, but it plays both ways. Regardless, does this make handicapping more difficult? It sure does. Of course. But we have to act, react, and adapt to that. It's not the same arguement that Baffert is making -- two different tracks -- nobody bets on "races in the morning" and if you can't see what the works are, mean, and are reflective of, etc., well that's another issue.

The trainer -- is looking for consistency. Sure, in an ideal world, that would be ideal. It's safe, reliable, etc. However, Baffert is taking this arguement to an extreme; or perhaps Zayat is. This is not taking the speed out of the track, or the game. It's a byproduct, not a goal. Cause and effect? Should there be tweaking? OK, but I think in the larger picture, that decision needs to be left to the experts -- or the closest ones to being an expert, and I don't think Baffert or Zayat fall into that camp.

The majority of the trainers and jocks I've spoke with are positive about the surface. Sure, there's a learning curve, a life-cycle, and change is inevitable -- liked, disliked, wanted, or not.

I think Baffert is distorting the real issue here. Talking about "taking the speed out" is somewhat narrow-minded. How does it affect him more than others? Because of the yearlings, 2yo's, etc. he bought? What about other trainers? It's a futile arguement.

The claims of the manufacturers about maintenence, ongoing costs, and everything else is also not the issue here. You can't unring a bell. That's more scapegoat type of excuses to distort or deflect the arguement as well. I don't think that saying "weather was neglected" or not taken into consideration, or anything of the like for that matter, justifies anything.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-01-2007, 10:10 PM
King Glorious's Avatar
King Glorious King Glorious is offline
Atlantic City Race Course
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Beaumont, CA
Posts: 4,614
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ELA
More on this story . . .

http://www.drf.com/news/article/87205.html

I see both sides of the fence on this. However, as much as I hate to say it, I think a good amount of the criticism is "crying" -- and that's not meant as criticism.

The bettor is used to, wants, is looking for, etc. -- a bias, pattern, trend, whatever you want to call it. Reliability is something that could be ideal, but it plays both ways. Regardless, does this make handicapping more difficult? It sure does. Of course. But we have to act, react, and adapt to that. It's not the same arguement that Baffert is making -- two different tracks -- nobody bets on "races in the morning" and if you can't see what the works are, mean, and are reflective of, etc., well that's another issue.

The trainer -- is looking for consistency. Sure, in an ideal world, that would be ideal. It's safe, reliable, etc. However, Baffert is taking this arguement to an extreme; or perhaps Zayat is. This is not taking the speed out of the track, or the game. It's a byproduct, not a goal. Cause and effect? Should there be tweaking? OK, but I think in the larger picture, that decision needs to be left to the experts -- or the closest ones to being an expert, and I don't think Baffert or Zayat fall into that camp.

The majority of the trainers and jocks I've spoke with are positive about the surface. Sure, there's a learning curve, a life-cycle, and change is inevitable -- liked, disliked, wanted, or not.

I think Baffert is distorting the real issue here. Talking about "taking the speed out" is somewhat narrow-minded. How does it affect him more than others? Because of the yearlings, 2yo's, etc. he bought? What about other trainers? It's a futile arguement.

The claims of the manufacturers about maintenence, ongoing costs, and everything else is also not the issue here. You can't unring a bell. That's more scapegoat type of excuses to distort or deflect the arguement as well. I don't think that saying "weather was neglected" or not taken into consideration, or anything of the like for that matter, justifies anything.

Eric
Adjusting to Polytrack
By STEVE ANDERSEN
DEL MAR, Calif. - The first two weeks of racing on Del Mar's new Polytrack synthetic surface have left trainer Art Sherman baffled at times on the best way to prepare his horses.

He says the course he trains over in the morning is firmer than it is during the afternoon, when abundant sunshine makes the course more tiring. It has not been an easy transition for a trainer long-accustomed to racing on a speed-oriented conventional dirt track, and it has forced him to change his training style.

"I let them gallop and open up in the last part," he said, referring to a quicker finish during morning exercise. "I'm putting more miles in them. I'm training hard. I'm trying to adapt in how I train. It's been a long process.

"A couple of horses that ran well at Hollywood Park, I thought they'd run well and they staggered in."

Put simply, Sherman wishes the course played quicker, but realizes that is unlikely to occur.

"I've had a couple of different issues," Sherman said. "I think we have two different tracks from the morning to the afternoon. I wish they could tighten it down. If they could tighten it down, that would be the way to go."


Sherman said one adjustment he has made is expecting slower times for workouts and races. He had two horses - All Thee B and Movie Fan - work six furlongs in 1:16.80 on Wednesday morning. On a conventional dirt track, or even a Cushion Track synthetic surface such as Hollywood Park's, that would be slow time, but the time did not concern Sherman.

"That was a decent work," he said. "They would have gone in 1:14 on a different surface. You have to adjust."

Friday, Sherman starts Mike's Trippin in the eighth race, a maiden claimer over 5 1/2 furlongs. Mike's Trippin, winless in six starts, has enough speed to be an early factor. How the 3-year-old will handle his first start on Polytrack is a mystery to Sherman.

Sherman is convinced that Mike's Trippin needs every advantage to win Friday. He fears the track is not conducive to front-runners, which will make it more difficult for Mike's Trippin to win despite the race's short distance.

The modest race is Mike's Trippin's first start as a gelding, according to Sherman, who took the precaution of shipping the 3-year-old from Hollywood Park to Del Mar last week to give him a few extra days of training on Polytrack.

"He's a speed horse," Sherman said. "Maybe by the last race, the track might tighten up."
---------------

Riot, u asked what others? Shirreffs and Sherman to name a couple who have come forward in the past day. As I said, if u know anyone that works around there or anyone that knows anyone, ask. U will come to realize there are others.
__________________
The real horses of the year (1986-2020)
Manila, Java Gold, Alysheba, Sunday Silence, Go for Wand, In Excess, Paseana, Kotashaan, Holy Bull, Cigar, Alphabet Soup, Formal Gold, Skip Away, Artax, Tiznow, Point Given, Azeri, Candy Ride, Smarty Jones, Ghostzapper, Invasor, Curlin, Zenyatta, Zenyatta, Goldikova, Havre de Grace, Wise Dan, Wise Dan, California Chrome, American Pharoah, Arrogate, Gun Runner, Accelerate, Maximum Security, Gamine
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-01-2007, 11:03 PM
10 pnt move up's Avatar
10 pnt move up 10 pnt move up is offline
Oriental Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,745
Default

In the end the market will tell us if its acceptable to both horsemen and the player, if no one runs and even worse if no one plays then you will see changes.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-01-2007, 11:12 PM
letswastemoney's Avatar
letswastemoney letswastemoney is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Turlock, CA
Posts: 2,561
Default

just train the horses differently
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-02-2007, 06:42 AM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob
AP Through July 22:

Closers- 33%
Stalkers 25%
Pressers: 17%
Speed: 25%

Winning Margin:

1/2 length or less: 30%
3/4-2: 34%
2 1/4- 4: 22%
4 1/2+ 14%

Outside: 54%
Inside: 46%

Chalk: 29%
3-1 or less: 48%
7-2 to 9-1: 34%
10-1 + 18%

Average Payoff
Poly: $15.00
Turf: $13.39
bob, where did you get this info?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-02-2007, 07:43 AM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
bob, where did you get this info?
No where special....a program from Arlington last Thursday..Page 17
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-02-2007, 08:10 AM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob
No where special....a program from Arlington last Thursday..Page 17
aww, that's what I thought.
I was hoping to get the same info for other tracks, to compare.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-02-2007, 08:21 AM
GBBob GBBob is offline
Hialeah Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,342
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
aww, that's what I thought.
I was hoping to get the same info for other tracks, to compare.

I'd also like to compare it to AP's dirt numbers same time last year. I'm sure they differ, but maybe not as much as other track's dirt to poly conversions, based on what I've been reading about Delmar and saw at Keeneland
__________________
"but there's just no point in trying to predict when the narcissits finally figure out they aren't living in the most important time ever."
hi im god quote
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-02-2007, 08:59 AM
Danzig Danzig is offline
Dee Tee Stables
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: The Natural State
Posts: 29,942
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
aww, that's what I thought.
I was hoping to get the same info for other tracks, to compare.
maybe you can find it somewhere on the racing web sites...
__________________
Books serve to show a man that those original thoughts of his aren't very new at all.
Abraham Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-06-2007, 07:41 AM
SentToStud's Avatar
SentToStud SentToStud is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArlJim78
aww, that's what I thought.
I was hoping to get the same info for other tracks, to compare.
Try this link

http://www.brisnet.com/cgi-bin/edito...cle.cgi?id=318

in the left section of that page, go to the "At A Glance" tab and pick your track. Hope this is what you were looking for....
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-07-2007, 01:19 AM
ultracapper ultracapper is offline
Les Bois
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 46
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GBBob
AP Through July 22:

Closers- 33%
Stalkers 25%
Pressers: 17%
Speed: 25%

Winning Margin:

1/2 length or less: 30%
3/4-2: 34%
2 1/4- 4: 22%
4 1/2+ 14%

Outside: 54%
Inside: 46%

Chalk: 29%
3-1 or less: 48%
7-2 to 9-1: 34%
10-1 + 18%

Average Payoff
Poly: $15.00
Turf: $13.39
hard to say the arlington poly is unpredictable when you're getting $8 or less on almost half the winners. alot of bettors are complaining about del mar being unpredictable. anybody know what percentage of 1st, 2nd and 3rd favs are winning? i'll bet not much difference from years past. i think the problems most 'cappers are having at del mar is in their heads. they're psyching themselves out as much as anything.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-02-2007, 08:30 AM
rgustafson rgustafson is offline
Bowie
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riot
.

Does anybody have figures on Kee, Turf, Arlington, or even first days of Del Mar, regarding what percentage of horses have won from front, stalking, closing? I've seen some published, can't recall where.
Riot,after a quick look at the BRIS summary reports for DMR through July 30, races at 5.5,6.0, and 6.5 furlongs show 65%-70% of the winners being designated as running style E or EP. The two turn races show almost the opposite trend, with P and S horses winning the majority of the races.These numbers for poly only, no turf.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.