|
|
 |
|
|
|
#3
07-19-2007, 07:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
#4
07-19-2007, 08:18 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Shhhhhh.... Derbycat is a SHE not a HE. Don't hurt her feelings. Maybe Ptman & Pmac picked an entry?
__________________
"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawaken. 
|
|
#6
07-19-2007, 08:28 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
07-19-2007, 11:18 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Don't worry all, I'm not easily offended
 If you look under the running totals - which lists the DT Member, the results of their most recent pick {ex: S for a "show" pick followed by the total payoff across the board - this is to help determine winners in case there are ties for Steve's weekly prizes}, followed by their current record in the contest {ex: 3: 2-1-0 means that in three races, you picked two winners and a horse that placed}, followed by the total payoff across the board for all current races. Since Steve has weekly prizes I figured more detail was better so we can determine the top players easier. My only question for Steve is, what takes a higher priority - W/P/S record or total payoff amount? If one player has a record of 4-0-1 $20 because he plays chalk but another person took some chances and was 3-1-1 $40 - who would you consider the winner?
__________________
You have your way. I have my way. As for the right way, the correct way, and the only way, it does not exist. - Friedrich Nietzsche on Handicapping
|
|
#8
07-19-2007, 12:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
And what is up with our fearless leader being out after day one?
 Just teasing you Steve.
__________________
"Until one has loved an animal, part of their soul remains unawaken.
|
|
#9
07-19-2007, 01:12 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
Correction
Hybrid Mode
