Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-17-2007, 01:12 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardus
Replacing one of Belmont's turf courses with a synthetic surface would rob Belmont of one reason why it is special (at least in my eyes): having dual turf courses allows for a plethora of turf racing.
I agree, synthetic is not the answer for every track. To me Belmont and Saratoga seem fine the way they are.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2007, 01:52 PM
parsixfarms parsixfarms is offline
Churchill Downs
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Saratoga Springs
Posts: 1,779
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardus
Eventually, Aqueduct will be sold. The land is too valuable. Whether it is sold to be converted into housing or commercial interests -- or sold to the Port Authority -- the Big A will not be around much longer.
Not so fast, my friend. I think there is a lot of resistance in the NY legislature to closing Aqueduct, and in case you hadn't noticed lately, the Governor and the legislative leaders haven't exactly been playing nice lately.

A racino, given public transportation issues, is likely to be far more successful at Aqueduct, and I'm told that NYC leaders might oppose having the racino taken out of one of the five boroughs and placed in Nassau County. Besides, from a racing perspective (overtaxing one racing suface/turf courses, lack of stall space, non-winterized plant or racing surfaces) closing Aqueduct would be a colossal mistake, and the cost of winterizing Belmont would be enormous.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-17-2007, 02:28 PM
Benevolus
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cardus
Eventually, Aqueduct will be sold. The land is too valuable. Whether it is sold to be converted into housing or commercial interests -- or sold to the Port Authority -- the Big A will not be around much longer.
I have to agree. It really isn't necessary anymore anyway. There is no reason why they can't run at Belmont all year. I love Belmont but they really don't need two turf courses. Just make the inner course a polytrack and run on it in the winter and turn Belmont into a casino all year round. They just need to make more LIRR trips from NYC directly to Belmont but the track is already there anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-17-2007, 10:22 PM
sumitas sumitas is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,362
Default

Hold on now. If Belmont has one turf course the condition of the turf will be compromised. With 2 turf courses the surfaces at Belmont are in great shape. I feel uneasy about trying to cram everything into just Belmont.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-17-2007, 11:41 PM
JJP JJP is offline
Gulfstream Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,220
Default

If they have to make any PolyCrack, I'd say make the inner dirt at the Big A. But the PolyCrack people will jump in and claim that you can't make one of them Poly; they all have to be, the paddock and walking ring have to be. They claim that their brilliant creation will be polluted by surrounding dirt. I really have no idea if any of those claims are substantiated. Sounds like propaganda to me.

Anyone see the infomercial on DelMar's polytrack? They might as well have had Tony Robbins doing the narration.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.