![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I had heard Empire would make the switch if it won the franchise.. but never heard NYRA was actually considering it. I just don't see why they would make a change when there hasn't really ever been a problem to begin with.
__________________
Alcohol, the cause and solution to all of life's problems. -Homer Simpson |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hope it was just confusion and that they are just considering poly at Saratoga on the Oklahoma training track. It would probably be fine at Aqueduct but absolutely no need for it at Belmont or Saratoga. I guess Belmont could probably support all three surfaces.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
With the well-doumented problems on the Aqueduct main track, I think installing Polytrack there (which would give winter racing with far more options than the current inner dirt track) would make a great deal of sense.
I've also heard that there may be some consideration of installing it on the Oklahoma training track, especially with many of the past mainstays remaining in KY to train over Polytrack rather than coming to Saratoga for "off-season" training. I think it would be a while before we ever see Polytrack at either Belmont or Saratoga. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
this all makes a lot more sense to me.
__________________
Alcohol, the cause and solution to all of life's problems. -Homer Simpson |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
It certainly "makes the most sense" to do AQU, one of Belmont's inner, and the Oklahoma track... but i am telling you the Empire and NYRA proposals are for all 3 *main* tracks. UGH! I hope they come to their senses if this article is correct.
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
If I read the tea leaves correctly, I don't think we need to worry about anything Empire may have planned to do to NY racing.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Very sad
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4ySSg4QG8g |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
So when they close AQU, who will get the left over poly?
|