![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
This horse will be exposed by Pletchers other three year olds, especially the Dogwood one that recently won. In fact I would guess CQ won't be in the Sanford where his two big 2yr olds are expected to run. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just read CQ has a little half bro by Fugi Peg that hasn't been named yet.
__________________
“To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” Thomas Jefferson |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
CQ is a slow version of Officer. Not my words but the words of somebody who really knows horses.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I liked the horse going in, singled him and got a little taste of the p-3 ending there. Missed the p4 ... went 3 deep in the last, but left out the 3-1 winner. grrrrrrrr. He ran great, imo. Dominated as he should have, imo. Look forward to his next. He may well be just the 23rd best 2yo in the barn, then again, he's a Graded winner. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Answer me this. If you owned a horse today -- right now -- ranked a bit higher in Todd's barn than CQ... say the #4 2 yo colt and let's say CQ is, oh, 6th --- would you truly rather own that colt as opposed to the Graded winner CQ? Right now, today? Just curious. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'd go the other way, but, good luck! That's why they let us wager on these things. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wonder why do they run races? If this race dosent move him to the top of the class, all the naysayers are just dealing with potential. This horse has produced and he has potentialmm also. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck. Most often it is a duck. This horse ran like a champ,has a champ potentia and a champ pedigree. In spite of all the complants about this horse. He is the target now.
|