Cavs can't shoot!

[SCUDSBROTHER]

Originally Posted by pgardn

You know what you said about Parker... You know how you beat up on a teenager. All teenagers need a sports psychatrist I guess. And you know losing a bet "spurred" your hatred.

I KNOW I DIDN'T SAY THAT "HE WOULD NEVER WIN A CHAMPIONSHIP." I know that is your fiction.You want to win your arguments with people so badly that you lie,and latch on to any off topic subject you can think of.He won a championship with the Spurs in 2003,and I put money on the Spurs to win it again in 2004.I didn't talk to you until spring 2004.So,all this is you just having trouble keeping your lies straight.When you're caught telling a lie,you gotta tell another one.You evidently lost track of the fact PARKER won a ring before I ever wrote anything on the ESPN site,but you can't go back.Now you are stuck trying to sell the lie that I said Parker(already with a ring in spring 2004) would never win a ring.That's what ya wrote.You're just a caught liar.How many more lies you gunna tell to try to make that lie seem true? They just snowball right back to you,and you better keep track of each one.

[Mortimer]

rule-emg un ze flour!!





leff-eng may ess oaf!!!

Originally Posted by SCUDSBROTHER

I KNOW I DIDN'T SAY THAT "HE WOULD NEVER WIN A CHAMPIONSHIP." I know that is your fiction.You want to win your arguments with people so badly that you lie,and latch on to any off topic subject you can think of.He won a championship with the Spurs in 2003,and I put money on the Spurs to win it again in 2004.I didn't talk to you until spring 2004.So,all this is you just having trouble keeping your lies straight.When you're caught telling a lie,you gotta tell another one.You evidently lost track of the fact PARKER won a ring before I ever wrote anything on the ESPN site,but you can't go back.Now you are stuck trying to sell the lie that I said Parker(already with a ring in spring 2004) would never win a ring.That's what ya wrote.You're just a caught liar.How many more lies you gunna tell to try to make that lie seem true? They just snowball right back to you,and you better keep track of each one.

I remember the summer the Spurs played the Lakers. Thats when you professed your bet. I dont remember anything about the spring or 2003. I dont even think you were on the ESPN site. If you were I dont remember. So it may have been another poster that chimed in about Parker choking.

You know what you said AFTER the Spurs lost to the Lakers. That is when it all went down. NOT before. Thats when you spewed your hatred AFTER the Spurs LA series was over. So maybe you said a ring again. All I know is you said the Spurs would not win a championship with Parker. This may have been after he had a ring. But you said typed this, and you said he needed some sort of mental help. And you disparaged him constantly and unecessarily... YOU KNOW THIS. I wish we had a friggin polygraph machine.

Plus you have avoided a question about your profession, since you constantly refer to mine in a belittling way. So if you want to bet, where is your source of income?

[horseofcourse]

Being the Cavs homer that I am I haven't gotten to comment on this since I was on vacation and wasn't typing. Spurs too good this year. I fail to think the Cavs were completely overmatched however as many are suggesting especially the talking heads this series. They shot atrociously at home in game's 3 and 4 and still had legitimate chances to win both games. It was partially SA defense, but they also missed a ton of uncontested shots especially from the 3 point line. The only game that was a blowout was game 2 when the Spurs lit it up for 3 quarters.

What bothered me most about the series was the Cavs suffered a major injury and it was tossed in the garbage and not even considered a factor by the talking heads. The only one who even mentioned it was Rick Carlisle. Their starting point guard was in street clothes in game 3 and 4. Would it have been a story if the SA starting point guard was in street clothes in game's 3 and 4?? Larry Hughes is certainly no superstar or a great shooter, but he is a 15 point, 4 rebound, 4 assist guy through the year and through the first two playoff series'. He scored 2 points in the entire series and played 43 minutes total...on cortisone shots. Hughes was a guy who averaged 37 minutes a game during the season. And to act like his injury was a non factor in the Cavs play as virtually everyone on the planet did excluding Rick Carlisle was ludicrous. They masked it the Detroit series, but playing against SA is a different beast. It is no surprise Parker could not be stopped. That would have been Hughes' responsiblity for the most part. I typed before the series that the guy who scared me this series was Parker and I was 100 percent right. I knew Hughes could not guard him in his condition or even come close...which left whom?? A 21 year old Gibson.

Let's not forget the Cavs played their best ball in the regular season when Hughes became the point guard and Pavlovic moved into the starting lineup. In the end, I think there is no way even a healthy Cavs team beats San Antonio this series, but with a healthy Larry Hughes, this series is still going on in my mind without question.

It is a darn shame the Cavs had to play their first finals series undermanned with an absolutely major injury and that not a person even considered it a factor in their play was stunning.

You got 15 points, 4 boards and 4 assists in street clothes and it isn't a factor or even worth mentioning. Strange. My guess is if the Spurs number 2 scorer (Parker) is in street clothes, it's talked about just a tad bit more!!!

(anyone want some cheese with that whine???)

[Cannon Shell]

Originally Posted by horseofcourse

Being the Cavs homer that I am I haven't gotten to comment on this since I was on vacation and wasn't typing. Spurs too good this year. I fail to think the Cavs were completely overmatched however as many are suggesting especially the talking heads this series. They shot atrociously at home in game's 3 and 4 and still had legitimate chances to win both games. It was partially SA defense, but they also missed a ton of uncontested shots especially from the 3 point line. The only game that was a blowout was game 2 when the Spurs lit it up for 3 quarters.

What bothered me most about the series was the Cavs suffered a major injury and it was tossed in the garbage and not even considered a factor by the talking heads. The only one who even mentioned it was Rick Carlisle. Their starting point guard was in street clothes in game 3 and 4. Would it have been a story if the SA starting point guard was in street clothes in game's 3 and 4?? Larry Hughes is certainly no superstar or a great shooter, but he is a 15 point, 4 rebound, 4 assist guy through the year and through the first two playoff series'. He scored 2 points in the entire series and played 43 minutes total...on cortisone shots. Hughes was a guy who averaged 37 minutes a game during the season. And to act like his injury was a non factor in the Cavs play as virtually everyone on the planet did excluding Rick Carlisle was ludicrous. They masked it the Detroit series, but playing against SA is a different beast. It is no surprise Parker could not be stopped. That would have been Hughes' responsiblity for the most part. I typed before the series that the guy who scared me this series was Parker and I was 100 percent right. I knew Hughes could not guard him in his condition or even come close...which left whom?? A 21 year old Gibson.

Let's not forget the Cavs played their best ball in the regular season when Hughes became the point guard and Pavlovic moved into the starting lineup. In the end, I think there is no way even a healthy Cavs team beats San Antonio this series, but with a healthy Larry Hughes, this series is still going on in my mind without question.

It is a darn shame the Cavs had to play their first finals series undermanned with an absolutely major injury and that not a person even considered it a factor in their play was stunning.

You got 15 points, 4 boards and 4 assists in street clothes and it isn't a factor or even worth mentioning. Strange. My guess is if the Spurs number 2 scorer (Parker) is in street clothes, it's talked about just a tad bit more!!!

(anyone want some cheese with that whine???)

You are absolutely correct. Unfortunately for you as a Cavs fan, they are severly hamstrung by the salary cap with a few bad contracts and are going to have trouble retaining Pavolic and Anderson let alone bring in anyone new.