Freedom of Speech revisited

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by hi_im_god

h l menken said that.

here's another (circa 1920):

The larger the mob, the harder the test. In small areas, before small electorates, a first-rate man occasionally fights his way through, carrying even the mob with him by force of his personality. But when the field is nationwide, and the fight must be waged chiefly at second and third hand, and the force of personality cannot so readily make itself felt, then all the odds are on the man who is, intrinsically, the most devious and mediocre — the man who can most easily adeptly disperse the notion that his mind is a virtual vacuum.

The Presidency tends, year by year, to go to such men. As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.

Cool! Yep, he forsaw the coming of George Bush!

[skippy3481]

Somer i think you are in the mainstream here. I think all people regardless of religion, think these people are supreme whack jobs. It's just sad they have to do it cloaked in religion.

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by skippy3481

Somer i think you are in the mainstream here. I think all people regardless of religion, think these people are supreme whack jobs. It's just sad they have to do it cloaked in religion.

Yep, same as extremist Muslims who resort to terrorism, or extremists of any religion (although I've never seen bands of Buddhist monks rampaging about or Wiccan death squads)