Trainer-Jockey angle

[SentToStud]

Originally Posted by philcski

Contessa-Garcia-Winning Move stable crushed the Aqueduct meet. I expect the same next year.

I think the owner part of the combo is the most important factor. All the trainer , jock and jock/trainer percentage and ROI info is all very well organized and widely available and, in essence, is worked into the tote board. . The owner part of the equation is not but it's very important; to me, the most significantespecially in claiming races and at mid-level tracks. Formulator helps here if you use it but I tried it and it's cumbersome. It takes me a lot of time to track this and keep it current where I play but I think it's worthwhile. It's also a big reason I find it unwise to play more than one circuit.

[rgustafson]

Originally Posted by SentToStud

I think the owner part of the combo is the most important factor. All the trainer , jock and jock/trainer percentage and ROI info is all very well organized and widely available and, in essence, is worked into the tote board. . The owner part of the equation is not but it's very important; to me, the most significantespecially in claiming races and at mid-level tracks. Formulator helps here if you use it but I tried it and it's cumbersome. It takes me a lot of time to track this and keep it current where I play but I think it's worthwhile. It's also a big reason I find it unwise to play more than one circuit.

Yes, I think we fans of Maggi Moss can attest to that