Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-01-2007, 06:52 PM
SentToStud's Avatar
SentToStud SentToStud is offline
Arlington Park
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
There were some smoke and mirrors trip wise in those three WVA wins---all soft trips, against moderate company----however, his figures are stone cold legit.

He figures to get his trip here---so we should find out if he's just a freak at MNR and only a good horse elsewhere...or if he improved and developed since his loss as the 2/5 favorite to Diabolical four starts back.
We'll see. He's got about a 1 in 5 chance of NOT being 3 wide on the turn. If Off Duty breaks decent or better, he could be 4 wide. He's going to have a hard time passing two graded winners and holding off another graded winner off the trip he's likely to get.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-02-2007, 04:58 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaHoss9698
Small field and all, that was a very sharp effort. That horse can flat out fly.

and he looked effortless doing it as well Jay.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-02-2007, 05:07 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Missed Churchill Downs track record for six furlongs by just 0.05 seconds.......
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-02-2007, 05:09 PM
XIIPointStables XIIPointStables is offline
Washington Park
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 858
Default

Impressive indeed!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-02-2007, 05:09 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Missed Churchill Downs track record for six furlongs by just 0.05 seconds.......

Sure seemed to me like if he wanted it, it would have been no problem.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-02-2007, 05:12 PM
Bobby Fischer's Avatar
Bobby Fischer Bobby Fischer is offline
Oaklawn
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,401
Default

great!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-02-2007, 05:18 PM
Kasept's Avatar
Kasept Kasept is offline
Steve Byk
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Greenwich, NY
Posts: 44,131
Default

that..

was..

impressive..

Did Dominguez even move on him? Horse did it 'upright'.. Wow.
__________________
All ambitions are lawful except those which climb upward on the miseries or credulities of mankind. ~ Joseph Conrad
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right. ~ Thomas Paine
Don't let anyone tell you that your dreams can't come true. They are only afraid that theirs won't and yours will. ~ Robert Evans
The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command. ~ George Orwell, 1984.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-02-2007, 05:20 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasept
that..

was..

impressive..

Did Dominguez even move on him? Horse did it 'upright'.. Wow.

wow Byk...that's like a years worth of emoticon's use for you all in one post


wonder where they will point him next?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-02-2007, 05:25 PM
ArlJim78 ArlJim78 is offline
Newmarket
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kasept
that..

was..

impressive..

Did Dominguez even move on him? Horse did it 'upright'.. Wow.
it's remarkable but thats how he runs with his head up, just gliding along.
He's the Michael Johnson of the horse world with that style.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-02-2007, 05:19 PM
saucon17's Avatar
saucon17 saucon17 is offline
Randwyck
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bethlehem, Pa.
Posts: 1,259
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GPK
Sure seemed to me like if he wanted it, it would have been no problem.
That Ramon's style to win by just enough and to save some energy for the next race. Hard to believe one of the top sprinters in the country is stabled at Penn National.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 06-02-2007, 05:22 PM
GPK GPK is offline
5'8".. but all man!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 3 miles from Chateuax de la Blaha
Posts: 21,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saucon17
That Ramon's style to win by just enough and to save some energy for the next race. Hard to believe one of the top sprinters in the country is stabled at Penn National.

Yeah Mike...seemed to me watching FS prick his ears, it looked like he was looking for someone to run with him. It looked like he was just out for a jog the way he was doing it so easy.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-02-2007, 06:18 PM
Athletics005 Athletics005 is offline
Pimlico
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by saucon17
That Ramon's style to win by just enough and to save some energy for the next race. Hard to believe one of the top sprinters in the country is stabled at Penn National.
And the other best sprinter is based at Golden Gate Fields. It would not be a shock to see the two top sprinters hook up in the Smile. I know that's where Smokey is headed, and we know Gilchrist likes the event as hes been well represented the last three years. It looked like Smokey was tons the best in this division, and then suddenly this horse strikes into contention. Amazing race, but there was no foes like Smokey in that race.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-02-2007, 05:09 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

It is pretty rare I would call a horse an overlay at 4 to 5, but this is one of those times.

How soon do you think it will be until we see a horse with such gigantic figures, earned multiple times, go off at that price?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-02-2007, 05:25 PM
blackthroatedwind blackthroatedwind is offline
Jerome Park
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 9,938
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
It is pretty rare I would call a horse an overlay at 4 to 5, but this is one of those times.

How soon do you think it will be until we see a horse with such gigantic figures, earned multiple times, go off at that price?

I was thinking the same thing.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-02-2007, 08:44 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

I would guess around 112. I only said a bit off his previous 120s.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-02-2007, 08:51 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
I would guess around 112. I only said a bit off his previous 120s.
I was dumbfounded that they let a horse that fast get away with a first quarter of 22 2/5, which obviously affects the final time a tick or two, but to be realistic with the track playing as fast as it was today to earn a 120 he would have had to broken the track record by over a half a second.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-02-2007, 08:54 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

Since speed figures take the track into account, his previous 120s say smashing the track record was within his realm.

As you say, the slow opening 1/4, and that is very slow for Churchill, probably contributed to the lower time more than anything else.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-02-2007, 08:59 PM
philcski's Avatar
philcski philcski is offline
Goodwood
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mission Viejo, CA
Posts: 8,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cmorioles
Since speed figures take the track into account, his previous 120s say smashing the track record was within his realm.

As you say, the slow opening 1/4, and that is very slow for Churchill, probably contributed to the lower time more than anything else.
I know the "if it looks like he's doing it easily he isn't going to run faster if pressured" adage but all things considered, he might have been able to. That was an absolute waltz to go 1:07 3/5.

Speaking of track records, I was at Monmouth today and the horse that ran behind Unbridled Sidney in the turf sprint the day before the BC last year crushed the track record at 5.5F on turf, 1:00.81.
__________________
please use generalizations and non-truths when arguing your side, thank you
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-02-2007, 09:02 PM
cmorioles's Avatar
cmorioles cmorioles is offline
Santa Anita
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 3,169
Default

They haven't been running 5.5f on the turf at Mth very long at all. Mid meet last year maybe?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-03-2007, 06:03 AM
golfer's Avatar
golfer golfer is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,608
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philcski
I was dumbfounded that they let a horse that fast get away with a first quarter of 22 2/5, which obviously affects the final time a tick or two, but to be realistic with the track playing as fast as it was today to earn a 120 he would have had to broken the track record by over a half a second.
I think the slow first quarter is what allowed Cougar Cat to hang in for 2nd money.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.