![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think you made a stupid comment, and certainly don't because of what someone else said, and not only believe he could be in this year's BC mile. I could EASILY see him in the Maker's Mark at Keeneland next spring to begin his year.
He won one race, with a perfect trip against a bad field, I would hardly say the rest of his career is written on stone. And, it certainly shouldn't be. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I won't be surprised to see him in the Met Mile either. I think the evidence is FAR from conclusive that he's a better turf horse than dirt horse and as Joel has pointed out there is little interest in breeding to turf horses in the US and for reasonably good reason.
A lot of decisions about this horse's future seem to be being made based on one race. I'm not so sure the best race he ever ran wasn't his debut. And, running 6th in the Derby, on two weeks rest with little bottom, wasn't too shabby either. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Tagg wasn't the only one who thought this, some guys who really know the business saw the same thing. I believe a few large offers were made on the horse, but I have no idea if that is really the case. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|