If you are interested....

justindew · #1 05-17-2007, 10:59 AM

I couldn't come up with a better choice for 3rd. Plus, I can't spend all week dissing Hard Spun and Curlin, and them use them in the tri.

SentToStud · #2 05-17-2007, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by justindew

I couldn't come up with a better choice for 3rd. Plus, I can't spend all week dissing Hard Spun and Curlin, and them use them in the tri.

Your article was a pleasant read. I give you credit for looking deeper into the field to come up with CP West and (for right or wrong) taking a stand against the 2nd and 3rd favorites.

slotdirt · #3 05-17-2007, 11:04 AM

You bet with your pockets, not with your pen. I'm sure lots of us have dissed horses around here then used them when we get to the window.

justindew · #4 05-17-2007, 11:08 AM

There aren't many chances in the year to bet into huge pools. I like to take a chance and maybe cash a big ticket on those days.

Even I will admit that the odds of both Curlin and Hard Spun missing the tri are not strong. But I think the odds are stronger than most would admit.

The Indomitable DrugS · #5 05-17-2007, 11:09 AM

Pinnacle has posted their odds for the race.

Their linemakers Curlin obsession continues, as they have him at only +352. Once again, you'll get better than that on race-day.

Street Sense is once again being generously offered at +156 (better than 3/2 odds) They had him as high as 6/1 on Oaks day. You probably won't be sniffing 3/2 on him come Preakness day....as he will flirt with even money, and would be odds-on if not for the fact that horses like Mint Slewlip and Xchanger will likely be strongly underlaid by novice money.

Bystander · #6 05-17-2007, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

Pinnacle has posted their odds for the race.

Street Sense is once again being generously offered at +156 (better than 3/2 odds) They had him as high as 6/1 on Oaks day.

They've been reading your prolific posts.

The Indomitable DrugS · #7 05-17-2007, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bystander

They've been reading your prolific posts.

They are sneaky devils aren't they.

Bystander · #8 05-17-2007, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

They are sneaky devils aren't they.

I should have said they've been SWAYED by your prolific posts. I hear Nafzger may scratch because of you.

The Indomitable DrugS · #9 05-17-2007, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bystander

I should have said they've been SWAYED by your prolific posts. I hear Nafzger may scratch because of you.

He called me up and asked me if he thought the Peter Pan would be a better spot.

When I told him I'd back wheel him in that spot as well....he finally concluded that he indeed made the right decision by entering the Preakness

Bystander · #10 05-17-2007, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS

He called me up and asked me if he thought the Peter Pan would be a better spot.

When I told him I'd back wheel him in that spot as well....he finally concluded that he indeed made the right decision by entering the Preakness

Phew.

tycharles01 · #11 05-17-2007, 11:13 AM

Why do I keep hearing Mint Slewlip more than CP West??

Was his trip in the Withers that bad?? or what

philcski · #12 05-17-2007, 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tycharles01

Why do I keep hearing Mint Slewlip more than CP West??

Was his trip in the Withers that bad?? or what

I'll be using CP West underneath, simply because I'm a dumb goo goo for this guy and keep expecting an improvement which hasn't come.
At 20-1 it's worth one more chance.