Kentucky Oaks 133 Field

[philcski]

Originally Posted by hockey2315

Phil-

Can you elaborate on this? I respect your opinion so I'm just wondering what your rationale is. . .

She has significant distance limitations. I really like the filly, but she's best served around 1 turn. Her one successful two turn race (in Tampa) was against a field she absolutely laid over, and against higher level competition such as the FG race she was really laboring down the stretch.

I wouldn't touch her in this race. If Pletcher was doing right by the horse instead of listening to her owners, she'd be running in the La Troienne instead (and probably winning.)

[Mortimer]

And you have significant posting limitations.




Come on Philski....get with the program here.

[philcski]

Originally Posted by mortimerdexterfoxworthy

And you have significant posting limitations.



Come on Philski....get with the program here.

As in I make sense to normal cognative humans?

[Mortimer]

Originally Posted by philcski

As in I make sense to normal cognative humans?

As in you're stupid!!


Now you git back in the thread war you belong...you smelly ol' varmint...you.

[ddthetide]

if anyone is looking, NTRA.com has the PP's up for the Oaks.

[mclem10011]

Sealy Hill? Rags to Riches looks to be the Oaks/Derby double single, but i give Sealy Hill a longshot chance.

[fpsoxfan]

Originally Posted by mclem10011

Sealy Hill? Rags to Riches looks to be the Oaks/Derby double single, but i give Sealy Hill a longshot chance.

Just started looking at the race and i couldn't help but love the breeding here

[Buffymommy]

Mistical Plan. What are her chances? She looks like a friggen colt.