Derby Trail Forums

Go Back   Derby Trail Forums > Main Forum > The Paddock
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-10-2007, 11:47 PM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

When I did my figure projections...I had the route races 3 points faster than the Beyer figures.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-11-2007, 07:54 AM
Dunbar's Avatar
Dunbar Dunbar is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
When I did my figure projections...I had the route races 3 points faster than the Beyer figures.
DrugS, three questions that are probably fairly obvious, but I want to be sure. (1) when you do your figs, do you do them before you look at the Beyer figs? (2) are your figs "tripless" figs (ie, not trying to add or subtract for bias, trouble, etc?, and (3) are they on the same scale as the BSF's ? (ie, in a perfect world, would they match up exactly?

Thanks,
--Dunbar

PS--very nice thread-starter, JJP!
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar
photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-11-2007, 08:11 AM
The Indomitable DrugS's Avatar
The Indomitable DrugS The Indomitable DrugS is offline
Flemington
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,007
Default

Yes, I make my projections before I see what the Beyer figure maker came back with...and I use the same scale.

I never add or subtract points for ground loss, bad trips, etc. I don't believe it's wise to. I might think a horse might have had about 2 or 3 lengths worth of trouble--but I would never factor that into the number....because those type of things can be difficult to quantify so accurately, and aren't always that cut and dry.

If you make a mistake with a figure--and have a number wrong, it can compound itself in the future, because you are going to be using that number when you make future figures. That's why I think non-computerized speed figures tend to act a lot more conservative when a tricky situation arises.

Now, I will sometimes take race circumstances and stuff like bias and pace into consideration when I do a card where a race on it doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to me. There are some real easy days, where you can have a figure for every horse on the card in less than 10 minutes time and be totally confident it's the right number. And, there are other days, when it is very hard to have complete confidence in the numbers that you came back with. For example, if there is only one route race on the card, you don't have much to work with. Or, if there is a change in weather.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-11-2007, 01:30 PM
Dunbar's Avatar
Dunbar Dunbar is offline
The Curragh
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,962
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Indomitable DrugS
Yes, I make my projections before I see what the Beyer figure maker came back with...and I use the same scale.

I never add or subtract points for ground loss, bad trips, etc. I don't believe it's wise to. I might think a horse might have had about 2 or 3 lengths worth of trouble--but I would never factor that into the number....because those type of things can be difficult to quantify so accurately, and aren't always that cut and dry.

If you make a mistake with a figure--and have a number wrong, it can compound itself in the future, because you are going to be using that number when you make future figures. That's why I think non-computerized speed figures tend to act a lot more conservative when a tricky situation arises.

Now, I will sometimes take race circumstances and stuff like bias and pace into consideration when I do a card where a race on it doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to me. There are some real easy days, where you can have a figure for every horse on the card in less than 10 minutes time and be totally confident it's the right number. And, there are other days, when it is very hard to have complete confidence in the numbers that you came back with. For example, if there is only one route race on the card, you don't have much to work with. Or, if there is a change in weather.
Thanks, DrugS.

--Dunbar
__________________
Curlin and Hard Spun finish 1,2 in the 2007 BC Classic, demonstrating how competing in all three Triple Crown races ruins a horse for the rest of the year...see avatar
photo from REUTERS/Lucas Jackson
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.