FG 4

[zippyneedsawin]

Originally Posted by RealBigD

a public figure, he would have to establish, in addition to the above, that the defendant acted with "actual malice." "Actual malice" exists where the publication was made with knowledge of the falsity of the statements or with reckless disregard of their truth or falsity. That is a high standard and it is difficult for a public-figure plaintiff to prevail in a defamation suit.

I don't think than an intent to cause harm is technically an element of a defamation claim.

actual malice.. yes.. knowingly making false statements.. that's the ticket! oh yeah and the public figure thing is a big part as well. 'intent to cause harm' was my general term (a poor one at best). thanks.