Rise of CF

[somerfrost]

Originally Posted by Bababooyee

OK. You still didn't answer the question.

Why is the Hillary/Obama version of forced collectivism any less objectionable than the Christian Right version? If it has nothing to do with the "Christian" part, what is it?

Both groups have a vision of utopia, and both are seemingly willing to use force or the threat of force to make it happen. You get all moist over one and say we should be scared of the other. If not because they are "Christians", what is it?

I don't frankly understand your allegation that Clinton and Obama have designs on "forced collectivism" as you put it...not saying you don't have a point, just saying I don't see the parallels here...please enlighten me and I'll be glad to respond!