![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The only way to get lucky and steal a race you aren't maybe the best in, is to take a shot. Kinda Like MOquette did with Seek Gold, or D wayne did one year in the Belmont with Commendable. Some guys only run their horses is soft spots to pad their % and never take a crack. They hurt their owners by doing this, picking out only soft spots and never giving the owners a chance to cash out and get lucky. Real good trainers do not pick out exclusively soft spots so they can get a win and pad the % totals. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
It was an over-medication of a legal drug administered more than 7 days in advance, that traced amounts stayed in the system on racing day. Love this Mentality that people have everywhere. 'Oh my God, that trainer got suspended for illegal drugs. He's a juicer! He's a juicer!'
__________________
"I don't feel like that I am any better than anybody else" - Paul Newman |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Answer is no they don't. Both Violtette's and Dutrow had overages of permissibel medications. Thats not cheating or doping. Cause if it is then I don't know how you can do business with people who do business with cheaters. Its nonsense to call Violette or Dutrwo cheaters. If you do that you can add Asmussen, Zito, Mott, etc to the list. They all did supsensions for overages of legal drugs. You really ought to study up if you wanna hold your own in a debate about racing matters with me for longer than 10 seconds. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"I guess I can have an opinion. Last I checked he has been caught before. Once you get caught you have to live with it. I just don't trust NY racing in general."
Why is this such a popular opinion among horse racing fans? To be honest I am not in the game nor will I ever be, just a gambler and a fan. NY easily has the best racing consistently throughout the year. I find racing at Churchill horribly boring outside Derby & Oaks week, racing in California except for Santa Anita an utter mess, and use to like Gulfstream but that has gone down the tubes except for a few big Saturdays early in the meet. People cheat everywhere. Its not exclusive to NY. Look at all the stuff thats gone down in Southern Cal over the past couple years. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.facebook.com/cajungator26 |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dont know what difference the odds make in dismissing an out of the money performance in a race where Dutrow was talking the horse up like he couldnt lose. "If my horse runs his race he will be very tough to beat" is what he said before the race. I thought he made a pretty easy lead for a horse of his ability and expected a better finish out of him thats all.
Not faulting Dutrow at all for trying this grade 1, I didnt think it came up all that particularly tough either. To be honest, I thought it was a real good chance for him to win a grade 1. |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dutrow has a poor opinion about his horses based on the comments he makes publically. Earlier this year he declared that New York Hero was going to win the Met Mile ( he was virtually eased ). Before Wild Desert made this year's debut, a losing one in a minor stake, he intimated he was as good a horse as he has ever trained. There is no better example of why one should ignore trainer's comments than the irrelevent verbiage coming out of his mouth.
|